Posted on 07/01/2009 11:02:49 AM PDT by Nachum
TEGUCIGALPA, Honduras Deposed Honduran president Manuel Zelaya says all he wanted was to conduct a public opinion poll even though the supreme court had ruled it illegal, the attorney general threatened to arrest him, and he faced mutiny in the armed forces.
(Excerpt) Read more at mcclatchydc.com ...
As the marxists try to cement power, O’Bummer backs them.
McClatchy is slightly to the left of Engels.
Re-Writing the Constitution of Honduras: Power Grab or Change Long Overdue? (March 2009)
On the evening of March 23rd, President Zelaya issued Executive Order PCM-05-2009 declaring that citizens of Honduras should be allowed to vote on whether or not to establish a National Constituent Assembly to review the Constitution of the country and consider re-writing it. ...The decision by Zelaya has quickly sparked a wave of criticism in Honduras decrying the move as little more than a strategy to allow him to remain in office past his term ...
Why do they keep calling it a coup? It was the opposite of a coup. It was the enforcement of their Constitution.
Oh I understand why 0bama, Chavez, Castro and all the other marxists want to call it a coup, but why does everyone else insist on demeaning the event by calling it the opposite of what it was?
Does sort of make ya wonder about our boy wonder punk president now doesn’t it?
The ‘opinion poll’ featured ballots printed in Venezuela.
Honduras Defends Its Democracy
Honduras Crisis: Zelaya Is A Threat To Our Democracy
Coup in Honduras - Correction: This is NOT a coup
Honduras Natives Say Democracy Preserved
Supporters of Honduras' President Manuel Zelaya shout slogans outside the presidential residence in Tegucigalpa, Thursday, June 25, 2009. President Zelaya's attempt to hold a referendum Sunday on changing the constitution has pitted him against the country's top courts, the attorney general, military leaders and even his own party, all of whom argue the vote is illegal.(Photo/Fernando Antonio)
Supporters of Honduran rule of law.
Demonstrators opposed to Honduras President Manuel Zelaya, protest in Tegucigalpa, Friday, June 26, 2009. President Manuel Zelaya is promoting a Sunday referendum on constitutional changes that has plunged the country into crisis by setting the president at odds with the military, the courts and the legislature that have branded the vote illegal.
A man holds a constitution of Honduras as demonstrators opposed to Honduras President Manuel Zelaya, protest in Tegucigalpa, Friday, June 26, 2009. President Manuel Zelaya is promoting a Sunday referendum on constitutional changes that has plunged the country into crisis by setting the president at odds with the military, the courts and the legislature that have branded the vote illegal. (Photo/Esteban Felix)
Students wearing gags on their mouths protest against Honduras President Manuel Zelaya outside the Venezuelan embassy in Tegucigalpa, Thursday, June 25, 2009. President Zelaya's attempt to hold a referendum on reforming the constitution has pitted him against the country's top courts, the attorney general, military leaders and even his own party, all of whom argue the vote is illegal. (Photo/Fernando Antonio)
My thanks to Rome2000 and cripplecreek for finding and posting these photos on this thread.
Because propaganda works. They are desperately trying to establish the "fact" that the "rule of law" insists that the "legitimate government" can never be removed, regardless of any level of tyranny imposed by that government.
For example, say you obtained power via an election that on its surface looked legitimate, but after the election some critical fact came to light that made the election illegal (such as you not being legally able to hold the office). Any attempt to remove you would be a "coup".
I wish we could count on the SCOTUS to stop BO when he goes beyond the law, for example the Chrysler deal.
SCOTUS can’t do anything unless someone brings a suitable case to them.
The whole article is just a tissue of lies. The rule of law did not break down it was upheld.
That referendum was not binding and made no mention of term limits, but the country's political leaders were suspicious.
The constitution of Honduras specifically forbids any such referendum. Only the congress can change the constitution with a 2/3s vote in two consecutive sessions. The constitution forbids changing presidential term limits by anybody even the congress. This article pegs the BS meter.
Apparently 90% of the world's press is bought off. Considering that the World Bank is supporting Zelaya that isn't so surprising.
Creditors don’t have “standing” in a bankruptcy case?
With 'yes' already marked on them and lots of Nicaraguans crossing the border to come vote with them.
Hm, and thus precedents set for when the truth about Obama’s ineligibility comes out. I was skeptical, at first, but I thought that it was STUPID not to simply ask (on the parts of the Congress or the USSC or the state’s secretaries who are in charge of ballots) for the requisite documentation.
I mean the worst that happens is everything is in order and the civil unrest/rumors are quelled. The best is that he is proven faulty and disqualified, thus proving by action that EVERYONE falls under the [same] law.
It's worse than that IMO.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.