[nmh]

I understand what she is doing but ...

we already have LAWS that a President MUST be a citizen.

Is there some reason why we can’t ENFORCE EXISTING LAWS?

[Miss Behave]

It's an expressed show of force in a "non-confrontational" form. It becomes a matter of record, going forward, to prevent (re-)election of frauds. The purpose is pointedly for what you mention. What lawmaker would not support this?

[MrB]

The left’s mentality regarding laws, contracts, vows, and Constitutions

is that they are not as valid as contemporary “wisdom” articulated by a few elite individuals.

Holding said elites to old standards is simply binding them to outdated rules which were based on less knowledge than is available now to the elites.

[Cboldt]

-- Is there some reason why we can't ENFORCE EXISTING LAWS? --

Funny you should ask. Yes. The reason is that we are a nation of men, not laws. The sooner the people wake up to this fact, the better.

I'm not being sarcastic in the least.

[ArrogantBustard]

I am NOT a Lawyer.

Here is a link to the relevant law. (Section 303(b) of the Federal Election Campaign Act (2 U.S.C. 433(b))). Please follow the link, and read the section before commenting.

I don't see anything in there actually enforcing the Constitutional requirement that POTUS be a "natural born citizen".

This amendment to 2 U.S.C. 433 adds such enforcement. It should have been done back in '71.

I am NOT a lawyer.