Posted on 06/30/2009 9:05:15 PM PDT by woofie
Speaking of that, I’m one of those people who never knew (until now) that there was no requirement to produce your documents in order to get on the ballot.
I’m astonished this hasn’t happened before, even in state and federal offices. It’s stunning, isn’t it?
Looks like the original seller of the BC has turned it over to WND and Joseph Fararr(spl).
You said — Im astonished this hasnt happened before, even in state and federal offices. Its stunning, isnt it?
—
This is what I’ve called (in many threads before, in the past) the *loophole* in the Constitution. It says you must be qualified, but if you merely swear that you are, that is satisfactory, according to what has been done for years.
Now, there have been some who have produced documentation, but this has not been required for running for office. For example, McCain did submit his birth certificate to a court, but it wasn’t required for him to do so; he just did it anyway, on his own. So, there’s not a precedent, even there, for someone to do it from now on. It was voluntary on his part.
That’s the *big loophole* in the “Constitutional Requirement” that we have stated in that Constitution. That’s a loophole that needs to be “closed down”.
AND..., by the way, this is not the “first time” (if it’s ever proven with Obama, that is) — that a President has been in office and has not been qualified under the Constitution. The 21st President was not qualified to be President. That was President Chester A. Arthur.
Donofrio, on his website, spells it all out about how he was not qualified. It sounds a lot like Obama. President Chester Arthur destroyed all his records so no one could ever find out. But, many years later, some records were found that exposed his secret of not being qualified to be President...
THEREFORE, the Constitution needs to have that loophole closed up. It will take a Constitutional Amendment to do that, or the state laws (like I was saying) as a stop-gap measure, right now.
bump
Seriously, if you think I’m ST, feel free to inquire and ask JR. If you think that, then I would say as far as dim bulbs, I’m a 75 watt and you’re a 40 watt. Anymore questions smartass?
Sorry.......I want to see what happens tomorrow and I have a reason for not wanting this on the open forum. I don’t want the Kos kids or DUmmies to have it.
What would be most interesting would be if there were any reaction at all from any official Obama source. Even an off-hand dismissal would be telling.
Along with Obama who would have his panties in a wad. ;-O
e-bay is one of the companies that supports HR2998 [cap&tax = glowball warming bill] Along with Starbucks, Nike, GE and HP.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2280834/posts
If he'd written that on FR, the Viking kitties would be rushing to the scene.
If the guy were on the level (which I've no doubt he is not), he wouldn't need all the secrecy and pussyfooting and ebaying.
bump for later in the day.
I believe Obama is hiding something; what I don’t know; so we shall see. I don’t think it is a tinfoil conspiracy to believe he is hiding something.
I agree with you. The trolls do come in droves to certain threads when they think you have something. LOL
Very strange. She sounds like that woman in the movie Fargo...lol. Just now trying to catch up in the thread. Praying it is all legit.
Nope. It eliminates this source as credible. Has no bearing on the issue of the BC.
My apologies, but I dont have the link readily available! But Feinstien did it and I am sure I read the details right here on FR.I will look today because it is something we should all jump on and RUSH as well. RUSH detailed how a RAT Representative has just introduced legislation to repeal the 22 nd Amendment opening up the possibility of a never ending term for OBOZO HUSSEIN!! Jus tlike his hero and Tormentor, Hugo Chavez NOW HAS!
Oh boy .. you’re still not getting the fine detail of what I’m seeing right now. And I could be brainfogged, as I’m not seeing it the way you are.
Also .. for this very reason:
~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~In his auction description, pay attention to what he says here:
“I plan to upload a video to Youtube. My user name is InspectorSmith. I’ve had the account for some time. I have never uploaded anything”
~~~
He’s never uploaded anything. That video titled “InspectorSmith’s Channel” is on ‘revolutionarytruth’s’ account and she has videos on it.
So I see the choice of words .. the exact words.
InspectorSmith ..... InspectorSmith’s Channel
As I’m seeing it, she wanted to talk about this after seeing the buzz about the auctions, so under her
‘revolutionarytruth’ youtube account, she opened a new category called “InspectorSmith’s Channel” and did this audio dissertation to get in on all the buzz ...
She speaks NOT AS InspectorSmith .. but as a person describing what InspectorSmith is doing.
To my logic, that does not absolutely make her InspectorSmith .. just that she’s employing the account name he stated in the auction to broadcast the news about his BC auctions.
There is one anamoly that does stand out strangely to me... that she has a picture that bares close resemblance to the “Andylenny” supposedly shown in his last auction .. the guy with the cap on his head at the top left of her video.
I’m sure willing to believe I’m wrong . . but these are the inconsistencies that are hitting me that make it seem fishy that they could be the same person; and, after reading his description, that this is his youtube account.
Feel free to clear up my fog .. LOL.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.