Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sen. Inhofe Calls for Inquiry Into 'Suppressed' Climate Change Report
Foxnews ^ | Monday, June 29, 2009 | Judson Berger

Posted on 06/30/2009 1:30:41 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach

Republicans are raising questions about why the EPA apparently dismissed an analyst's report questioning the science behind global warming.

A top Republican senator has ordered an investigation into the Environmental Protection Agency's alleged suppression of a report that questioned the science behind global warming. 

The 98-page report, co-authored by EPA analyst Alan Carlin, pushed back on the prospect of regulating gases like carbon dioxide as a way to reduce global warming. Carlin's report argued that the information the EPA was using was out of date, and that even as atmospheric carbon dioxide levels have increased, global temperatures have declined.

"He came out with the truth. They don't want the truth at the EPA," Sen. James Inhofe, R-Okla., a global warming skeptic, told FOX News, saying he's ordered an investigation. "We're going to expose it."  

The controversy comes after the House of Representatives passed a landmark bill to regulate greenhouse gas emissions, one that Inhofe said will be "dead on arrival" in the Senate despite President Obama's energy adviser voicing confidence in the measure. 

According to internal e-mails that have been made public by the Competitive Enterprise Institute, Carlin's boss told him in March that his material would not be incorporated into a broader EPA finding and ordered Carlin to stop working on the climate change issue. The draft EPA finding released in April lists six greenhouse gases, including carbon dioxide, that the EPA says threaten public health and welfare.

An EPA official told FOXNews.com on Monday that Carlin, who is an economist -- not a scientist -- included "no original research" in his report.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 111th; globalwarming; globalwarminghoax; inhofe; inhofegw
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

1 posted on 06/30/2009 1:30:41 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Putting politics in front of science....

Du? DU?


2 posted on 06/30/2009 1:32:56 PM PDT by icwhatudo (For every clinic bombed or burned, 17 to 18 churches are burned down. MSM? MSM?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

About time some congress critters to seek the truth.


3 posted on 06/30/2009 1:33:10 PM PDT by lilylangtree (Veni, Vidi, Vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Here is another story of quashed reporting of scientific discovery.

More proof that MMGW is a political tool used to bilk billions for re-distribution and government control.


4 posted on 06/30/2009 1:33:30 PM PDT by Tenacious 1 (Government For the People - an obviously concealed oxymoron)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

I am glad that Sen. Inhofe is working on this.

The House Energy & Commerce Committee tried to have a presser on this Thursday, but nothing was getting reported on that day unless it involved Michael Jackson.

This coupled with the IG firings should ruffle some feathers.

I seem to remember some congressional Dems with noses out of joint when it came to the “politicization” of (INSERT HERE) during the Bush administration.


5 posted on 06/30/2009 1:34:56 PM PDT by KRyanJames
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steelyourfaith; xcamel; SunkenCiv; Fred Nerks
Related thread:

Memo exposes global warming dispute - EPA science called 'stretch'

6 posted on 06/30/2009 1:35:36 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Can the EPA be trusted with your money? I think they have
been trying to devalue this country for years through
various regulations.


7 posted on 06/30/2009 1:36:31 PM PDT by ully2 (ully)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Oh forget about this. They’re already off to ban another gas.

http://www.epa.gov/air/nitrogenoxides/


8 posted on 06/30/2009 1:37:41 PM PDT by wolfcreek (KMTEXASA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Here it is: http://cei.org/cei_files/fm/active/0/DOC062509-004.pdf


9 posted on 06/30/2009 1:38:34 PM PDT by GRANGER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

many related
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/search?m=all;o=time;q=quick;s=Suppressed


10 posted on 06/30/2009 1:38:44 PM PDT by xcamel (The urge to save humanity is always a false front for the urge to rule it. - H. L. Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
I actually read (most) the report. It is extremely well sourced and soooooo damaging to the global whiners that they HAVE to suppress it. Excellent charts showing the cyclic nature of ups and downs in temps, lowing in temps despite rises in C02, solar flares, you name it. Take the time and read it. Arm yourself.
11 posted on 06/30/2009 1:40:09 PM PDT by DadOfFive (...wake me when it's over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Anyone hear from Michael Steele on this issue? .....crickets.....again?


12 posted on 06/30/2009 1:40:36 PM PDT by cbkaty (I may not always post...but I am always here......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

It wasn’t “dismissed.’ It was SUPPRESSED! Purely for political reasons. This is a disgrace, as fraudulent “science” is being used to rob the public.


13 posted on 06/30/2009 1:40:50 PM PDT by Oldpuppymax (AGENDA OF THE LEFT EXPOSED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DadOfFive

This (may) turn out to be a Christmas gift in July for the nation.


14 posted on 06/30/2009 1:41:33 PM PDT by AxelPaulsenJr (Please God Save The United States From Barack Hussein Al-Obama. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
This should be required reading for all RINOS

15 posted on 06/30/2009 1:42:41 PM PDT by Uri’el-2012 (Psalm 119:174 I long for Your salvation, YHvH, Your law is my delight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Hey Imhofe, are you going to actually follow through and insist upon making this a major issue, or are you just another incredibly weak, phony, sellout weasel with an “R” next to your name?

Unfortunately, I think I know the answer.


16 posted on 06/30/2009 1:43:25 PM PDT by raptor29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo
Putting politics in front of science.... Du? DU?

More like putting their own ass in front of everything...
17 posted on 06/30/2009 1:43:46 PM PDT by alecqss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

The entire cap and trade fiasco was started by ENRON.


18 posted on 06/30/2009 1:45:22 PM PDT by subterfuge (BUILD MORE NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS NOW!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
From the article:
An EPA official told FOXNews.com on Monday that Carlin, who is an economist -- not a scientist --
At least he's an economist and not just a failed presidential candidate (who isn't any more of a scientist than Carlin is).
19 posted on 06/30/2009 1:49:16 PM PDT by Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
The issue is really one of statistical inference and not about scientific inquiry per se.

Apparently Mr. Carlin's bosses have decided that statistics as understood and used by economists are not relevant to scientific materials.

The problem we had on a recurring basis at USPS Headquarters was about "addition" and "division". Some of the top level managers, and members of the Board of Governors, regularly disputed the results of both.

Over the years I've observed that the problem with addition and division extended far beyond USPS into the halls of Congress and sometimes the White House.

20 posted on 06/30/2009 1:51:34 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson