Skip to comments.
Congresswoman Mary Bono Mack Feels The Heat On Energy
kpsplocal2.com ^
| June 30, 2009
| Stella Inger
Posted on 06/30/2009 12:58:50 PM PDT by Watershed
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
"It's beyond time for our nation to become energy independent and embrace future energy sources. While, not perfect, this bill takes bold steps forward that will help create new green jobs, build a stronger , more sustainable American energy supply and reduce our dependence on foreign oil." I guess she's just another pretty face. She certainly is not a thinking woman.
It seems that Ms. (Bono)Mack is getting some criticism. I just wrote telling her I would financially be supporting whomever the "other guy" is.
1
posted on
06/30/2009 12:58:51 PM PDT
by
Watershed
To: Watershed
Mack is certainly dumber than advertised. Considering there was no bill to read, how the hell does she know what’s in it?
2
posted on
06/30/2009 1:01:56 PM PDT
by
mgc1122
To: Watershed
that Sonny sure could pick ‘em, couldn’t he?
To: Watershed
Republicans who oppose the bill says the legislation will hurt business and drive jobs to more pollution friendly places like China. That's because the bill includes a cap-and-trade system which puts a price on carbon emissions . Still, local Democrats applaud Bono Mack. "This bill is a step in the right direction. I was pleased to see other constituents urging her to vote . I was glad to see she did it, "said Elle Kurpiewski, Democrats Of The Desert =========================================================== That the democrats applaud her supporting the bill should say everything she needs to know about it.
To: Watershed
“It’s beyond time for our nation to become energy independent and embrace future energy sources”
Did the b!+C& read the damn bill? It’s utter fantasy to believe it is going to “help us become more energy independent!” Because of impossibly high pollution standards, we can forget refineries and coal, so more imports are in the offing. These idiots are killing us. I will financially support WHOMEVER runs against these clowns in 2010, party be damned.
5
posted on
06/30/2009 1:03:00 PM PDT
by
ScottinVA
(Impeach President Soros!!!)
To: mgc1122
Longshot, but her constituents should keep pressuring her, so she’ll change her vote.
6
posted on
06/30/2009 1:03:08 PM PDT
by
Boiling Pots
(B. Hussein Obama: The final turd George W. Bush laid on America)
To: Watershed
They just elected Al Frankin.
7
posted on
06/30/2009 1:03:31 PM PDT
by
freekitty
(Give me back my conservative vote.)
To: Watershed
She must be quoting some DNC talking points since her message sounds almost identical to Mark Kirk’s excuse.
8
posted on
06/30/2009 1:04:56 PM PDT
by
MediaMole
To: Watershed
What Ms. Mack needs to understand, as well as others, is that we liked our country just the way it was before they decided what we need. I like oil, I like “OUR” oil and oil shale. I like our coal. I don’t like being told that I have to pay for all of their pipe dreams and corruption, welfare and all the other crap they hand out.
9
posted on
06/30/2009 1:05:06 PM PDT
by
RC2
To: Watershed
Has anybody announced they are running against her in the primary?
10
posted on
06/30/2009 1:06:34 PM PDT
by
Nateman
(If liberals aren't screaming you're doing it wrong.)
To: Watershed
"While, not perfect, this bill takes bold steps forward that will help create new green jobs, build a stronger , more sustainable American energy supply and reduce our dependence on foreign oil." She has no clue what's in it. Stupid!
To: Watershed
The vote was idiotic. She needs to be replaced with a Constitutionalist.
12
posted on
06/30/2009 1:06:44 PM PDT
by
Recovering_Democrat
(I'm SO glad I no longer belong to the party of Dependence on Government!)
To: Watershed
Hope they keep up the pressure. If the senate makes changes and passes something, then these worthless reps will have to vote on it again.
To: Watershed
can't believe she voted yes on an energy bill that is aimed to limit pollution
Carbon Dioxide is not Pollution
14
posted on
06/30/2009 1:07:22 PM PDT
by
Jeff Chandler
(The University of Notre Dame's motto: "Kill our unborn children? YES WE CAN!")
To: Watershed
A step in the right direction my ass. If a step in the right direction puts you on a railway track, you are still dead when the train comes.
To: Boiling Pots
Longshot, but her constituents should keep pressuring her, so shell change her vote.
In addition to calling all eight yesterday I also contacted John Boehners office to ask if he was trying to convince them to change their minds. An aide insisted the motion to reconsider was a mere formality and the votes could not be changed. She stated the motion to reconsider referred to an alternative Republican bill. She asked me if I ever watch CSPAN in order to make a weak attempt to explain the motion to reconsider is a standard procedure that occurs for many bills.
16
posted on
06/30/2009 1:08:12 PM PDT
by
Man50D
(Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! FairTaxNation.com)
To: mgc1122
The collective stupidity of the legislature is made up of the singular stupidty of its individual members.
To: Watershed
“I was glad to see she did it, “said Elle Kurpiewski, Democrats Of The Desert.”
Glad you say you friggin’ IDIOT Kurpiewski? You will be the loudest voice in the Condo bitching about the “brownouts”, and lack of A/C when it’s 118 deg. Fah. out there in the desert.
Belay that, as you won’t be able to afford living out in the Desert with A/C when the Democrats get through with it all.
18
posted on
06/30/2009 1:08:38 PM PDT
by
rockinqsranch
(Dems, Libs, Socialists...Call 'em What you Will, They ALL have Fairies Living In Their Trees.)
To: Buckeye McFrog
He ran in to a Tree just to get rid of her.
To: Watershed
While, not perfect, this bill takes bold steps forward that will help create new green jobs, build a stronger , more sustainable American energy supply and reduce our dependence on foreign oil." Precisely none of which is remotely true.
And, it's not an erroneous statement.
It is not a fib, or a mis-statement.
It is a premeditated, calculated, vulgar and insulting LIE!
.
20
posted on
06/30/2009 1:09:04 PM PDT
by
Seaplaner
(Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson