Posted on 06/30/2009 9:30:53 AM PDT by Maelstorm
It’s slowly starting to make the news, now. To be sure, the “mainstream” media is doing as little as possible to cover this heinous crime, but the new media is starting to make it know despite their efforts to promote their “objective bias.”
I’m talking about Frank Lombard, Associate director of Duke University’s Center for Health Policy, and his despicable molestation of a 5-year old boy he adopted.
According to RPV Network, Lombard
was recently arrested by the FBI and charged with offering up his adopted 5-year-old African American son for sex to an undercover cop. Lombard admitted to molesting his own adopted son to the undercover officer in an online chat room under the user name “Perv Dad for Fun”. He invited the under cover officer to travel to North Carolina to rape his already-molested adopted son. Lombard faces 20 years in prison if convicted but is not eligible for the death penalty.
This is a video (see below) from a local newscast at WRAL; in case it doesn’t embed well, you can go here to watch the report. The video report says Lombard told undercover cops that he specifically adopted a black child because they are “easier to adopt” than white children. He also said that the abuse was easier to perpetrate when the child was too young to talk or know what was happening, and he had drugged the child with benadryl during the molestation. Lombard lived in the house with another homosexual, but waited until the partner was gone to perpetrate the abuse.
What a disgusting excuse for a human being. It doesn’t matter who did this to the child; it was extremely wrong. But as I alluded to before, perhaps because Lombard was a homosexual, the “mainstream” media seems to be keeping this outrageous crime very low-key…as they have done in the past when homosexuals have committed terrible crimes against children and other adults.
Research also indicates that the rate of molestation at the hands of homosexuals is higher than among heterosexuals.
Judith Reisman, president of the Institute for Media Education, says that Department of Justice statistics show that 67 percent of all reported sex abuse victims are children and 64 percent of forcible sodomy victims are boys under 12.
The Baptist Press also reports that a study a study by Dr. Gene Able, director of the Behavioral Sciences Institute in Atlanta, which was published in 1987 in the Journal of Interpersonal Violence, found that homosexuals sexually molest young boys with an incidence five times greater than the molestation rate of girls. The study found that 150 boys are molested by one male homosexual offender, compared to 19.8 girls by heterosexual offenders.
This is especially telling because according to a survey commissioned last year by the pro-homosexual Human Rights Campaign, only 2.9% of the population is homosexual. This means that while only making up a tiny portion of the overall population, the perpetration of male molestation by homosexuals is greater than the much larger general population.
This behavior would seem to go hand in hand with findings that homosexual males were molested as children at much higher rates than heterosexual men: 35% versus 4%; one study found a ratio as high as 46% to 7%. As a former law enforcement official, the information we had indicated that people who were molested as children have a greater likelihood of perpetrating that behavior on others when they grow up.
The Daily Mail from Great Britain reported last month that a homosexual activist was exposed as a ringleader in one of Scotland’s biggest pedophilia rings. According to the article, James Rennie, 38, molested a three-month-old baby boy.
Rennie, 38, molested the toddler son of unsuspecting friends – a little boy he had been trusted to babysit – recording the abuse and sharing it with other perverts.
During their investigations, police recovered tens of thousands of still and moving images of the most vile child abuse.
As bad as this is, it isn’t the worst of it:
One of the most worrying aspects of the case is the way Rennie was able to reach a position where he could influence Executive policy on child sexuality.
A trained teacher, Rennie became the boss of LGBT Youth Scotland, a publicly-funded support group for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender young people.
He took on the £40,000 a year role when the group was set up in 2003 and became the Executive’s most important and influential adviser on gay issues affecting children.
Under his leadership, the group backed proposals to allow gay adoption. As well as appearing in the Scottish parliament, he was invited to a Royal Garden Party and to Downing Street.
This is far from the first time this has happened. The Daily Mail in Britain reported two years ago that a homosexual couple were allowed to foster care for several children and ended up molesting four boys:
A homosexual foster couple were left free to sexually abuse vulnerable boys in their care because social workers feared being accused of discrimination if they investigated complaints, an inquiry concluded yesterday.
Craig Faunch and Ian Wathey were one of the first homosexual couples in the country to be officially approved as foster parents.
They looked after 18 children in only 15 months.
With no previous convictions, they came across as respectable men who simply wanted to help boys with a variety of problems.
In reality, they were paedophiles, who repeatedly abused the children in their care.
Even when the mother of two of the children reported her suspicions to the council, officials accepted the men’s explanations and did nothing.
Instead of banning children from staying with Faunch and Wathey, they sent youngsters with more serious problems to them. Between them, the couple abused four boys aged between eight and 14.
No doubt “hate crime” laws and vociferous legitimization of homosexual behavior led to this dereliction of duty on the part of officials charged with protecting these children. This is what can happen when political correctness is put ahead of the welfare of the innocent.
And how much of this do we simply not hear about, since the “mainstream” media sold out long ago to running interference for the homosexual agenda.
We are making the same politically correct mistake here in the United States that puts children in harm’s way.
President Obama and his wife Michelle both push homosexual adoption in the United States, putting children at risk and at best deliberately depriving them of either a mother or a father.
And as if to mirror this story from the UK, President Obama has appointed Kevin Jennings, one of the biggest homosexual activists in the country, to be Assistant Deputy Secretary of Education. He is now in a very influential position to shape educational policy for our nation’s children.
Yes, child molestation can and does happen with heterosexuals, and that is just as wrong and as damaging to the child. Do all homosexuals molest? No.
But if a person is willing to step over the line of one standard of sexual conduct to perform acts that are immoral, unnatural and unhealthy, how likely is it they may reach the point where they are willing to step over even more critical ones? The breaking down of moral barriers and progressive depravity is a step-by-step process for most offenders that gets worse with each new stage.
The primary duty of government is to protect innocent citizens from harm. Except for children still in the womb, there are no human beings more vulnerable to harm than children. The state must stop treating children as if they were merely pets to be passed around and start rigorously protecting them from any substandard environment and environments that carry higher risks.
Homosexuals doing what they want in the privacy of their own homes is one thing. For the state to place children in harm’s way and to disregard the duty of the state to above all protect the innocent is unconscionable.
Well - my husband and I were raised in 2 different types of approaches.
In his home, all the kids were treated “equally”.
When one child benefitted from a gift or some sort of perk, his parents felt the compulsion to balance it out somehow - to give everyone something so no one felt slighted.
Hubby thinks it taught them all as kids how to “keep score”.
They’d see a sibling score a point - they’d whine until they evened up.
My parents explained to me and my sisters - sometimes one child will get something and you won’t. Tough - deal with it.
It will even out in the end.
If you are resentful over someone else’s good fortune - you have a problem - get over it!
Nothing is “owed” to you, we love you and we will decide who needs what at any given time.
That was exactly my thought and I'd get great pleasure doing things to shock them too...LOL.
Not defending homosexuality here, but pedophilia is a different and heinous problem. Pedophiles are not attracted to adults of any sex. So I suppose you could have a category called homosexual pedophile. Unlike homosexual sex, pedophilia is by definition not consensual. Pedophilia is with pre-pubescent children. Saying that more pedophiles are attracted to boys than girls does not make it the same as homosexuals who are attracted to adults.
The technical term for adults attracted to post-pubescent children is pederasty. That is a clear homosexual problem. And in fact there are homosexual rights groups that actively advocate and support pederasty.
Dervish please quit it. You are peddling the line of the sexual activists. Where did you get that from some “Facts about pedophilia” web site set up by progressive activists. The same ones that say that same sex molestation is not homosexual. Next thing you are going to tell me meat eaters are vegetarian too. I recommend you read some of the literature just do a search of mainstream books on Amazon and look at the open idolization of young boys by the homosexual community? I hate to be harsh but I implore you to just check for yourself. Most of the stuff you’ve been told by the MSM media concerning homosexuals comes right from the mouths of activists that are no different than the ones like Al Gore supporting global warming.
Have you ever heard of cruising? Have you ever heard of rimming? Do you know why homosexuals contract so many exotic sexual diseases? Do you think it is a coincidence that so many homosexuals report that they were molested as children? Also it is fairly well accepted across the board that those who are sexually abused have a much higher rate of committing such abuse themselves especially if they go without treatment. Also individuals who have been abused exhibit some of the strong typical homosexual behavior such as the need for constant ego gratification, lashing out, severe depression.
What is really unfortunate is that the very gay activism that claims to liberate homosexuals has had the opposite effect in entrapping them in a demagogic position where they are least likely to deal with their abuse and more likely to abuse themselves. Not all homosexuals are abusers but it is without a doubt that a large percentage are compared to their population and it would be better to find out why and help them instead of pretending that adding little children to the mix with some how make everything just fine and dandy.
What we have with modern gay activism is medical and political malpractice that threatens all involved. There is absolutely no reason that a sane live and let live policy can be pursued that allows homosexuals who are happy to live peacefully unmolested without supporting the unreasonable path of the radical activists that destructively want to supersede and redefine the marital arrangements adopt children purposely into families that will never have the balance of a Mom and Dad, and without supporting a behavior that is intrinsically unhealthy and promoting it to the society as a whole through forced indoctrination and radical norming.
The problem is that the radical gay activists have been allowed to rule the show. They demand and demand and demand and each time they get what they desire they have new even more radical demands. This needs to be stopped.
Listen, you don’t know anything about me. I am dead set against the homosexual agenda. I believe sodomy laws should be upheld. I believe homosexuality is an abomination as stated in the bible. And I agree with you that the public has been propagandized and coerced into supporting so called gay rights.
But that does not change the science. Homosexuality is not the same as pedophilia. Pedophilia is not the same as pederasty.
“There is absolutely no reason that a sane live and let live policy can be pursued that allows homosexuals who are happy to live peacefully unmolested”
I don’t even agree with that.
I think sodomy is fundamentally unhealthy. The health problems you speak of have nothing to do with children they have to do with sodomy and promiscuity.
Considering all the talk about health care costs and preventable illness, why is no one talking about the extremely expensive and wholly preventable disease of HIV/AIDS? Why does our society have to pay for this choice?
And if you read my post you would see that I do NOT absolve homosexuals of child abuse. I siad they have a high rate and many support a right to pederasty.
But there is a difference between post-pubescent boys and children (pedophilia) .
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.