Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sotomayor reversed again: Firefighters can be promoted regardless of race
The Washington Times ^ | June 30, 2009 | Editorial

Posted on 06/29/2009 9:51:26 PM PDT by Abakumov

Martin Luther King can rest easy. His dream is being protected by the Supreme Court - against and over the opinion of Supreme Court nominee Judge Sonia Sotomayor.

The high court's landmark decision in Ricci v. DeStefano, the New Haven, Conn., firefighters case, is a dramatic stride toward the cherished goal of achieving a colorblind society. In Ricci, the court told us that people of ability can succeed regardless of skin color, and government bureaucrats seeking racially biased outcomes can be thwarted in their racist designs.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: affirmativeaction; newhavenfirefighters; racism; ricci; sotomayor; supremecourt

1 posted on 06/29/2009 9:51:27 PM PDT by Abakumov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Abakumov

Some evidence the system still works.


2 posted on 06/29/2009 9:56:07 PM PDT by TheThinker (America doesn't have a president. It has a usurper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheThinker

For now, anyway.


3 posted on 06/29/2009 9:57:20 PM PDT by Abakumov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Abakumov

Republican groups and Senators should be using this as a weapon against her.


4 posted on 06/29/2009 10:09:49 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld (A leader does not deserve the name unless he is willing occasionally to stand alone-Henry Kissinger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abakumov

I read the opinion, it’s a snake pit.

It was very well discussed that the City had done it’s level best to come up with criteria and a test that would be race-neutral. And they did, in fact, accomplish that result, as a very high level DHS official (who is black) reviewed the test and said all was in order, and the contents were necessary things for a leader in the firefighting field to know.

So the City set the rules, and there was NO OBVIOUS CLAIM THAT COULD BE MADE THAT THE TEST ITSELD WAS DISCRIMINATORY, then, because the City didn’t like the results (well, that’s another story, because there were obvious threats made against them if they didn’t toss the test), the test was thrown out. Solely on the fact that whites had outperformed minorities on all aspects.

Ginsburgs dissent was so weak, I’m surprised it was ever put to paper. It amounted to repeatedly saying “Well, the minorities didn’t score as well, so it must be the Cities and the tests fault”. She patently refused to believe it was either the amount of effort put in to it by the minority participants or any kind of racially based disparity in abilities which may or may not exist.

The net result is this is a stepping stone towards the Civi Rights act being repealed or amended. Drastically amended.


5 posted on 06/29/2009 10:18:23 PM PDT by djf (Go tell everybody its calm before the storm Can you hear the distant thunder baby....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: djf

She patently refused to believe it was either the amount of effort put in to it by the minority participants or any kind of racially based disparity in abilities which may or may not exist.

***

I read the opinion too ... ya shoulda added in parentheses after “amount of effort” (or lack thereof) ...


6 posted on 06/29/2009 10:27:17 PM PDT by Lmo56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lmo56

It’s also interesting and kind of telling that usually, when you have a case this close, more than one of the justices on the losing side join in the dissent.

But the other ones were silent. They couldn’t come up with anything about the facts or the law to oppose the finding.


7 posted on 06/29/2009 10:35:32 PM PDT by djf (Go tell everybody its calm before the storm Can you hear the distant thunder baby....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Abakumov

Sonia Sotomayor is a racist. That issue was proven when her judgement (about the firefighters) was over thrown by the Supreme Court. What did B. HUSSEIN Obama have in mind when nominating her for the highest post in the land? How to destroy America faster?.

The black people think caucasions are overly biased towards blacks. eg.Michael Jackson

Why did he want to become white? Because of his father?

GET A LIFE.

Comments on this article: return to list of blogs
Be the first to post your comment and/or rate this article.
Your comment (leave comment blank to rate the article only) Rate this article

Sonia Sotomayor is a racist. That issue was proven when her judgement was over thrown by the Supreme Court. What did B. HUSSEIN Obama have in mind when nominating her for the highest post in the land? How to destroy America faster?.

The black people think caucasions are overly biased towards blacks. eg.Michael Jackson

Why did he want to become white? Because of his father?

GET A LIFE.

Comments on this article: return to list of blogs
Be the first to post your comment and/or rate this article.
Your comment (leave comment blank to rate the article only) Rate this article


8 posted on 06/29/2009 11:16:03 PM PDT by joydocsusie (ILLEGAL ALIENS HAVE NO RIGHT TO OUR SOCIAL SECURITY MONEY OR ANYTHING ELSE IN THE USAh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abakumov; All
All day long I've been watching one jackass law professor after another defending Sotomayer's positions on affirmative action (aka discrimination). One question for these bow-tied bozos. If affirmative action is so wonderful, then why don't you volunteer to give up your tenured position at the University in favor of a qualified minority?

Yeah it's easy for these pigs (most of them) to have no sympathy for a hard working middle class guy who gets passed over for a promotion by an unqualified person. They don't give a *hit about him. They can't imagine that this just might affect them one day.

I've got just one thing to say to these rats. Be careful about using poison gas, the wind has a way of changing.

Boy how I hate law professors.
9 posted on 06/29/2009 11:20:56 PM PDT by truthguy (Good intentions are not enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abakumov

Sotomayor and the Ricci decision are like bacon and eggs for Obama, this is exactly what he wanted and what he planned. That your children may study and work hard, yet if the outcome is not of a politically correct racial designation then they will be put to the curb and thrown out with the trash. These firefighters studied their eyes out, and worked like dogs to pass the “racially approved” test and the ease and arrogance at which Sotomayor spit in their faces and canceled their dreams of advancement is beyond our belief in America as a nation of justice and fairness. What happened to hard work brings a worker a better life - not in Obama-Soto world, well, not if you are white firefighter who studies hard to pass a test.

The Sotomayor Ricci decision is the synecdoche of the Obama administration. This is what he unabashedly brings to the nation, and doesn’t bat an eye. Obama and his ilk will practice vicious reverse discrimination and place their cadres in higher and higher ranks within government who will act the same way and entrench our government with a deep and ugly prejudicial bias. Sotomayor proclaims it and was proud of it until the rest of the nation saw how ugly it really was.

I am glad the SCOTUS rejected her decision, it was unfair, and the the dissent was of such a weak stature that one knew that they really did not believe what they were writing. Liberals can be real hypocrites and phonies, and in fact this is the issue that they can be crushed on in November because over 70% of Americans believe this racial quota system is wrong.

Racism is wrong, period.


10 posted on 06/30/2009 12:13:33 AM PDT by Titus-Maximus (Light from Light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Titus-Maximus; All
Its called manufactured people for business called money let me introduce me myself and I, My name is lastsaint and i only represent my fathers but very inteteresting comments you make. Please do me a favor read the U.S.C. 42, 1982 and ezxplain to me what you see with this law.
11 posted on 06/30/2009 3:31:06 AM PDT by lastsaint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Abakumov; All

Hello Abakumov, My name is Lastsaint, I have a question for you do you read the law and the consitution?


12 posted on 06/30/2009 3:31:07 AM PDT by lastsaint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TheThinker
There are two issues here, yet only one is being discussed in the media:

First, is she a racist? YES -- Clearly; and yes, that is getting some press. But even bigger than that (can you imagine?!?) is how often she's been reversed by higher courts.

I saw buried in one article that she's been reversed something like 60% of the time! ANY judge nominated to sit on the Supreme Court who's been reversed that often should be immediately rejected.

Such statistics reek of incompetence.

So what we should collectively be emphasizing (besides her racism), is how often her decisions have been overturned. That's a drum that needs to be beat far and wide.

Everyone on here should bring this fact to the attention of their contacts in the media, members of Congress, friends and family.

FReegards,

13 posted on 06/30/2009 4:06:48 AM PDT by Matthew James (SPEARHEAD!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: djf
"She patently refused to believe it was either the amount of effort put in to it by the minority participants or any kind of racially based disparity in abilities which may or may not exist."

Proof that besides being unfair and biased, affirmative action and racial quotas produce an entitlement mentality and mediocrity. Regarding effort - expect less, reward less, get less.

It's a terrible disservice to the people who are being conditioned to expect to be rewarded regardless of the quality of their results / outcome, but it's a much bigger disservice to the people who's lives are on the line under the leadership of incompetents - in this case - the firemen in the station and the public they are supposed to protect.

14 posted on 06/30/2009 5:00:17 AM PDT by uncommonsense (liberals see what they believe and conservatives believe what they see)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Titus-Maximus
"That your children may study and work hard, yet if the outcome is not of a politically correct racial designation then they will be put to the curb and thrown out with the trash."

Remember these words - there will soon come a time where the tests are not designed to be racially unbiased, but they will be designed and optimized to produce the quotas that they deem appropriate. In other words, the tests will be highly biased toward a race in order to promote color over competence.

15 posted on 06/30/2009 5:27:37 AM PDT by uncommonsense (liberals see what they believe and conservatives believe what they see)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: uncommonsense

I fear you are right and hope you are wrong.


16 posted on 06/30/2009 9:05:18 AM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson