Posted on 06/29/2009 7:50:54 PM PDT by GOP_Lady
WASHINGTON -- The Supreme Court ordered new hearings in a case challenging McCain-Feingold, the law that aims to restrict political spending at election time, signaling the possibility it is considering a more sweeping approach to the question.
The court had been expected to rule Monday on a narrow question on whether McCain-Feingold applied to electioneering materials delivered through video-on-demand services. The case before the court involves a critical documentary about Hillary Clinton released during the presidential primary. The question before the court was whether it should be considered a campaign ad and regulated as such.
Instead, the court asked the parties to argue a much broader question: whether recent precedents upholding restrictions of corporate spending on political advertisements should be overruled.
(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...
The resolution will probably be no punishment for Her Thighness except a mandate to never run for office again. Not political at all. s/ off
Cross another one off the list.
Don't know what to make of this but it could be a good sign...
We shall see.
According to our laws, corporations rate the same as individuals.
So, I think it is a good sign.
This is another case of George trying to make nice with people who don't matter (John McCain in this case), and getting it stuffed up his backside. I hope our next Republican president understands that you can't try to make nice with the Dems and moderate/liberal Republicans. He should treat them like Pelosi, Reed, and Obama are treating us at the present time.
When Bush signed that POS I was appalled.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.