Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Hearings Ordered in Campaign-Finance Case (McCain-Feingold)
The Wall Street Journal ^ | 06-30-09 | JESS BRAVIN

Posted on 06/29/2009 7:50:54 PM PDT by GOP_Lady

WASHINGTON -- The Supreme Court ordered new hearings in a case challenging McCain-Feingold, the law that aims to restrict political spending at election time, signaling the possibility it is considering a more sweeping approach to the question.

The court had been expected to rule Monday on a narrow question on whether McCain-Feingold applied to electioneering materials delivered through video-on-demand services. The case before the court involves a critical documentary about Hillary Clinton released during the presidential primary. The question before the court was whether it should be considered a campaign ad and regulated as such.

Instead, the court asked the parties to argue a much broader question: whether recent precedents upholding restrictions of corporate spending on political advertisements should be overruled.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cfr; feingold; hearing; mccain; ruling; scotus

1 posted on 06/29/2009 7:50:54 PM PDT by GOP_Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady

The resolution will probably be no punishment for Her Thighness except a mandate to never run for office again. Not political at all. s/ off

Cross another one off the list.


2 posted on 06/29/2009 7:54:42 PM PDT by Rembrandt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady
Instead, the court asked the parties to argue a much broader question: whether recent precedents upholding restrictions of corporate spending on political advertisements should be overruled.

Don't know what to make of this but it could be a good sign...

3 posted on 06/29/2009 8:32:36 PM PDT by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganwuzthebest

We shall see.

According to our laws, corporations rate the same as individuals.

So, I think it is a good sign.


4 posted on 06/29/2009 8:36:00 PM PDT by GOP_Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady
This issue was the beginning of my problems with George Bush. He failed to uphold his oath of office by vetoing this legislation, even though he knew it was unconstitutional. He said he would sign it and let the Supreme Court overturn it.....well, I'm still waiting.

This is another case of George trying to make nice with people who don't matter (John McCain in this case), and getting it stuffed up his backside. I hope our next Republican president understands that you can't try to make nice with the Dems and moderate/liberal Republicans. He should treat them like Pelosi, Reed, and Obama are treating us at the present time.

5 posted on 06/30/2009 6:00:25 AM PDT by Retired COB (Still mad about Campaign Finance Reform)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Retired COB
A toast to your post!

When Bush signed that POS I was appalled.

6 posted on 06/30/2009 6:02:16 AM PDT by Loud Mime (It all makes sense when you understand that Obama is a Muslim.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson