Posted on 06/29/2009 12:28:54 AM PDT by Liz
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky) on Sunday said the Senate needs more time to review the record of Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor after new material surfaced from her time with the Puerto Rican Legal Defense and Education Fund.
Just a day or so ago, we discovered that there are 300 or so boxes of additional material that has just been discovered from her time working with the Puerto Rican Legal Defense Fund, McConnell said in an interview on Fox News Sunday. The committee needs to have access to that material and time to work through it so we know all the facts before we vote on a person who is up for a lifetime job, McConnell said. The Senate Judiciary Committee is scheduled to take up the nomination on July 13. Republicans have complained bitterly about the timetable for considering the nomination. Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) is aiming for a floor vote before the Senate breaks in August.
Sotomayor served on the groups board of directors from 1980 to 1992. Conservatives opposed to her nomination have seized on a 1981 memo signed by her and two other directors of the group, which is now called LatinoJustice PRLDEF. In it, the directors argued against reinstating the death penalty in New York state, making the case that capital punishment is racist because it is disproportionately imposed on minorities.
Being Hispanic is not a criteria for seating a Supreme Court Justice. More is being made about her race than her actual judicial record. Clearly, Sotomayor's the "Latino Grievances" nominee......every ruling from the bench will be ironclad to redress every latino grievance since time immemorial. Americans will be paying with our freedoms for those Frito Bandito commercials. The fact that Sotomayor----and her crowd----do not understand a democracy is based on three co-equal branches of government is grounds for showing her the road.
She has the same disdain for America and its citizenry as evidenced by Obama. When he talks about "judges with empathy," the following decisions are what Obama means. Obama says he wants an "empathetic" justice. Did Sotomayor ever "empathize" with a gun owner or a middle-class white woman? More likely her empathy is limited to to liberal Democarat victim groups and voting blocs Dems need for relection and campaign contributions. )
By Ann Coulter
HUMAN EVENTS---Vol. 53 Issue 39, p 11,
17 OCTOBER 1997
TITLE: PROBABLE CAUSE FOR REJECTING JUDGE SONIA SOTOMAYOR
(Sotomayor was then on the Clinton Administration's fast track toward the Supreme Court.)
FR Posted May 31, 2009 Extremely Extreme Extremist
SOTOMAYOR'S ACTUAL WORDS FROM THE BENCH, SENTENCING ADMITTED DRUG DEALER Louis Gomez (a noncitizen), who pleaded guilty to dealing cocaine:
[I]t is in some respects a great tragedy for our country that instead of permitting you to serve a lesser sentence and rejoin your family at an earlier time I am required by law to give you the statutory minimum. ... [W]e all understand that you were in part a victim of the economic necessities of our society, unfortunately there are laws that I must impose. Louis Gomez, yours is the tragedy of our laws and the greatest one that I know. ... the one our congressmen never thought about and dont think about. ... It is no comfort to you for me to say that I am deeply, personally sorry about the sentence that I must impose, because the law requires me to do so. The only statement I can make is this is one more example of an abomination being committed before our sight. You do not deserve this, sir.
====================================================
Nelson Castellanos was arrested in NYC outside his Harlem apartment, charged with conspiracy to distribute cocaine. He was holding his keys and a white shopping bag containing about $10,000, mostly in $1 and $20 bills. That evening, pursuant to a warrant, DEA personnel searched his apartment and found over 1,200 grams of cocaine, six live rounds of ammunition, a .44 caliber revolver and incriminating notebooks. All this evidence was thrown out by District Court Judge Sonia Sotomayor on the grounds that the DEA agents had not provided the magistrate with probable cause to search Castellanos's apartment.
=====================================
NEWS ITEM REFERENCE Sen John Cornyn (R-Texas) said Sonia Sotomayor should explain whether she intends to be a justice "for all of us, or just for some of us," at July 13 Senate Judiciary Committee hearings......and whether she believes in colorblind justice. In 2001, she said a "wise Latina" would reach better decisions than a white man...... Cornyn said it suggests a judicial philosophy that suggests a judge is better qualified or more likely to reach better legal decisions because of sex, race or ethnicity....."I simply do not understand that contention, and I would like to ask her about it," Cornyn said. Cornyn has also questioned Sotomayor's stance on gun rights, property rights, and discrimination. Alabama Sen. Jeff Sessions criticized Obama, and argued that liberals are destroying the rule of law by picking judges who will bring their own feelings and politics to the bench.
If the Senate confirms Sotomayor, it will be only a matter of time until such convoluted, biased latino-centric sentiments begin to make their way into the legal opinions handed down from the High Court.............
During her now-famous address at the University of California School of Law, Sotomayor concluded in her rambling, nearly incoherent prose: "There is always a danger embedded in relative morality, but since judging is a series of choices that we must make, that I am forced to make, I hope that I can make them by informing myself on the questions I must not avoid asking and continuously pondering. We, I mean all of us in this room, must continue individually and in voices united in organizations that have supported this conference, to think about these questions and to figure out how we go about creating the opportunity for there to be more women and people of color on the bench so we can finally have statistically significant numbers to measure the differences we will and are making." ...........
HER INCOHERENT WORDS SOUND A LOT LIKE THE POLITICAL AGENDA OF THE THIRD WORLD---TO POPULATE THE US SO AS TO GET THEIR HANDS ON US TREASURE........and I quote "to have people of color in statistically significant numbers to measure the differences we will and are making."
Take ALL of the time you need (like 4 years).
LOL.........except it will not take long to find more of the judging inanities she's known for.


"Saying that someone would decide a case differently, better in fact, because she is a Latina, rather than a white male is racist - yes."
Ann Coulter, explaining Logic 101 to Diane Sawyer.
This incoherent racist appointee is Obama/Rahm in your face-—sticking it to America.
When you think of all the highly qualified jurists out there——distinguished white males who could have been nominated.............
America is forced to settle for this halfwit b/c of the disease of diversity.
Is this more of her attempts to hide her racist decisions? Read on.
CNS News: Sotomayor Failed to Disclose to Senate Memo in Which She Argued Death Penalty is 'Racist'
By Pete Winn, Senior Writer/Editor
FR Posted on 06/05/2009 by Sub-Driver
June 05, 2009 (CNSNews.com) The Judicial Confirmation Network (JCN) says Judge Sonia Sotomayor failed to disclose to the Senate Judiciary Committee a controversial document arguing that the death penalty is racist and a violation of the present humanist thinking of society.
The 1981 memo, they say, should have been disclosed as required under Question 12 (b) of the questionnaire that the Supreme Court nominee turned in Thursday. Question 12(b) requires a nominee to "(s)upply four (4) copies of any reports, memoranda, or policy statements you prepared or contributed to the preparation of on behalf of any bar association, committee, conference, or organization of which you were or are a member or in which you have participated."
JCN Counsel Wendy Long sent a letter Friday to Senate Judiciary Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) and members of the committee arguing that Sotomayor had not properly complied with this requirement because she had not submitted the 1981 memo on capital punishment.
It is . . . clear that (Sotomayor) has omitted controversial material from her past in which she asserts that '[c]apital punishment is associated with evident racism in our society' and advocated public opposition to restoring the death penalty in New York state, Long wrote to the committee. (Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...
btt
REFERENCE Judge Cabranes then-ruled that Sotomayors opinion failed to address the constitutional issues of the case, saying the majority had ignored the facts of the case as well. It did so, moreover, in an opinion that lacks a clear statement of either the claims raised by the plaintiffs or the issues on appeal. Indeed, the opinion contains no reference whatsoever to the constitutional claims at the core of this case, the judge criticized. This Court has failed to grapple with the questions of exceptional importance raised in this appeal, Judge Cabranes concluded.
It was proven on Friday with the “regulate and steal” vote our voices do not matter one whit. All those hours we have spent working mean nothing.
It was proven on Friday with the “regulate and steal” vote our voices do not matter one whit. All those hours we have spent working mean nothing.
It was proven on Friday with the “regulate and steal” vote our voices do not matter one whit. All those hours we have spent working mean nothing.
The perfect pic of Soto the Guru
:)

" Hokay, ai wise latina---who need hair straightener."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.