Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pawlenty won't delay if court rules for Franken
Politico ^ | 6/28/09 | Josh Gerstein

Posted on 06/28/2009 8:52:22 PM PDT by steve-b

Governor Tim Pawlenty (R-Minn.) said Sunday he has no plans for further delay in certifying the results of the state's disputed U.S. Senate election so that Republican Norm Coleman can pursue a federal court challenge.

Pawlenty told CNN that he would abide by whatever ruling the Minnesota Supreme Court makes in the contest, where Democrat Al Franken appears to have an upper hand.

"I'm prepared to sign [the certification] as soon as they give the green light," Pawlenty said. “I’m not going to defy an order of the Minnesota Supreme Court. That would be a dereliction of my duty."...

(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics/Elections; US: Minnesota
KEYWORDS: coleman; franken; pawlenty; senate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last
To: vetvetdoug
Doesn't anybody research their candidates anymore?

You do realize who are president is, don't you? That should answer your question.

21 posted on 06/28/2009 9:46:41 PM PDT by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jim from C-Town
The congress and the executive branches are the will of the people.

Right, if by "the people" you mean Soros, Acorn, Union bosses and internationalist Wall Street bankers and CEOs. The rest of us appear to have little to say about anything.

22 posted on 06/28/2009 9:52:37 PM PDT by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Daniel II
If violating your oath of office to uphold the constitution is not a high crime it is certainly a misdemeanor,IE an impeachable offense.

It is all in the way you look at things. Just ask Obama how holding majority ownership stakes in banks, and car companies is the least bit constitutional. It isn't.

23 posted on 06/28/2009 10:30:24 PM PDT by Jim from C-Town
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Prokopton

Well they are supposed to act as the will of the people.
Unfortunately most of the people can’t buy a major party.


24 posted on 06/28/2009 10:31:28 PM PDT by Jim from C-Town
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Jim from C-Town

Yeah, but unless the rule is stark and simple, it loses its initially understood meaning over time.

I mean, sometimes it comes down to “Let’s not argue and bicker about who killed who.” So, what’s a little violation of your oath of office between friends?


25 posted on 06/28/2009 10:55:09 PM PDT by Daniel II
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Jim from C-Town

And even then, “stark and simple” doesn’t get you there.

“Freedom of speech” has now become “freedom of expression.” “Freedom of religion” has now become “separation of church and state.” “Freedom of the press” can be limited by a “fairness doctrine.”

And just look what they’ve done to the 2nd ammendment. Geeze, it took them 200+ years to recognize it as an individual right.


26 posted on 06/28/2009 11:19:36 PM PDT by Daniel II
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Daniel II
The most confusing part is that the court has never been asked to rule upon the issue of a presidents eligibility due to status as a natural born citizen.

I simply believe that because of the situation with Obama, if he qualifies, which he must, he is the president(God I hate to say that), than jindal most certainly qualifies.

Heck Obamas father didn't even p[pretend to want to become a citizen. and the disingenuous prick is constantly referring to his father as an immigrant when he was actually a foreign exchange student.

27 posted on 06/28/2009 11:36:19 PM PDT by Jim from C-Town
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

finding new votes...”provisional” etc....was the ploy to get Gregoire elected her first time around here in Washington.....instead of recounting, they were busy FINDING new ballots, and shazaammm....they found mostly Rat votes...


28 posted on 06/28/2009 11:37:40 PM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: cherry
problems with places like Washington, Oregon, NY and Minnesota is that all it takes is for the one large city to be controlled by the Rats.....such as Seattle, or Portland, or Minneapolis, etc....

if the rat machine controls the large cities, then they can dictate the election....

29 posted on 06/28/2009 11:39:20 PM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Daniel II
And even then, “stark and simple” doesn’t get you there

I hear you. It takes a lawyer to be so obtuse that they don't understand what the term Shall Not means.

I sometimes believe that lawyers should be disqualified from congress and the judiciary. Common sense seems to be lost somewhere between the first and third year of law school. Must be all the Latin.

30 posted on 06/28/2009 11:43:02 PM PDT by Jim from C-Town
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Jim from C-Town
I wore a black armband for a week after the elections. While my boss was amused, my co-workers weren't.

I've been weeping for my country ever since. I know it died a lot earlier, but it was like the final blow, the coup de gras.

Well, there's always the revolution to look forward to. I heard it's kinda like an inquisition. Nobody expects it!

31 posted on 06/28/2009 11:45:58 PM PDT by Daniel II
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Daniel II
I'll be quite honest with you, I wouldn't be surprised if we experienced a military coup. Obama has already turned us into a banana republic. A coup d'état is the next logical step.
32 posted on 06/28/2009 11:52:56 PM PDT by Jim from C-Town
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Jim from C-Town

That would save us all a lot of grief.


33 posted on 06/28/2009 11:54:55 PM PDT by Daniel II
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Jim from C-Town

“The first thing we do, let’s kill all the lawyers.”

Love the Bard.


34 posted on 06/29/2009 12:12:18 AM PDT by Daniel II
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Jim from C-Town

I only wish that the USSC would recognize that every citizen has standing when it comes to constitutional issues.


35 posted on 06/29/2009 1:09:11 AM PDT by Daniel II
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: steve-b
"I'm prepared to sign [the certification] as soon as they give the green light," Pawlenty said. “I’m not going to defy an order of the Minnesota Supreme Court. That would be a dereliction of my duty."...

So Pawlenty thinks the Executive branch must bow down before the co-equal Judiciary branch of government.... What a coward. This assclown is definitely not presidential material. That speculation was a joke.

36 posted on 06/29/2009 1:31:02 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim from C-Town

By the time a “military coup” happens, it will be a welcome balancing “act” to aid in “political transition.”


37 posted on 06/29/2009 12:22:03 PM PDT by noah (noah)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson