Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: devere
No doubt he was a drug addict, and it cost him his life; but a jury found him not guilty of the sex charge, and I don’t know of any evidence they were mistaken. Do you have any evidence that the jury didn’t get to see?

These are links to a series of very detailed investigative stories published in Vanity Fair. They were written by Maureen Orth over a 12 year period of covering Jackson. The author notes that nothing published in these stories was ever legally challenged by Jackson or his associates. The case against Jackson is quite damning.

Michael Jackson is Gone But the Sad Facts Remain

Nightmare in Neverland

The Jackson Jive

Losing His Grip

Neverland's Lost Boys

C.S.I Neverland

134 posted on 06/27/2009 10:28:57 PM PDT by AHerald ("If you love me, you will keep my commandments." -- Jn 14:15)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: AHerald

Vanity Fair? Repeating the same stories over and over for 12 years doesn’t constitute proof. It constitutes commerce.

It seems that Jordie Chandler was invited by the prosecutor to testify under oath against Michael Jackson, and declined.
He had a chance to testify first in his own case, and then in the 2005 case, and both times he declined.

Macauley Culkin did testify under oath, and Michael Jackson was acquitted.

It’s hard to believe that someone as weird as Michael Jackson was actually innocent of child molestation, but after 32 hours of deliberation that’s what the jury ruled. I continue to think it was a correct verdict.


135 posted on 06/28/2009 12:05:52 PM PDT by devere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson