Hmmm....how about an analogy:
If a police officer stopped a crime in progress, and it was later discovered that the officer was an impersonator and not a member of legally appointed law enforcement, do you think the courts would allow a resulting conviction to stand? I don’t think so.
Since Obama was aided and abetted in this fraud, there will be more than a few Democrats standing in the docket alongside him.
I believe the courts will void government actions committed as a result of fraud.
I agree. Like a warrant that was not properly executed or drafted.
Anything that was found because of that warrant would immediately be thrown out as “fruit of the poisonous tree”
however, having said that, in NY they have let arrests stand based upon bad warrants after throwing out the stuff that was considered wrong.
It depended upon if the court thought that a certain action was “imminent” regardless of the warrant.
Have i explained that enough or did i confuse you in trying to explain it?