Sorry for the double post, but I inadvertantly left you off the response.
“True. But considering that Hacklehead’s #20 used precisely that comeback to jessduntno’s #1, I would hope that Hacklehead recognizes how ill-situated he is to take offense.”
Wow, so many responses about my “snarky” comment. First of all, it was pretty low on the snarkyness scale for FR, commonplace actually. Second, I didnt and wouldnt have taken offense when it was directed back at me. I will say however that in the many years I have been here (many more than indicated by my most recent screen name) I have never seen someone post an outdated message then follow it up 2 messages later with post that makes post #1 essentially obsolete. Why post the original if you are going to post he got his contract renewed 2 posts later? Add to that all the responses seemed to be unaware of the new developments. So excuse me if I missed post 3. As far as reading all posts before posting, its a best practice but not a realistic expectation. Like trying to get everyone to read the article before posting, good luck with that.
“I have never seen someone post an outdated message then follow it up 2 messages later with post that makes post #1 essentially obsolete.”
You still haven’t seen that - I posted them consecutively - I have no idea what the #1 and #3 nonsense you are writing is about - and they did not make anything obsolete, they were a continuation of the story. I don’t know what you are talking about here, but if you don’t think an apology is in order, I really don’t care. You got this one wrong again; let it go.