Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RobinMasters

If this is true I can’t say I am surprised. There’s a reason why the mullahs allowed for Mahmoud #2 to be in the balloting.


3 posted on 06/23/2009 9:46:39 AM PDT by pnh102 (Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: pnh102

Seriously, the issue now is NOT Mousavi vs I’manutjob.

It’s about the Iranian people vs the Mullah Government.

It’s about their ability to actually choose their leadership.

So it doesn’t really matter that there wasn’t a dime’s worth of difference between them.


11 posted on 06/23/2009 10:52:00 AM PDT by MrB (Go Galt now, save Bowman for later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: pnh102

The Iranian Nutjob president may have been one of the terrorists involved in the 1970s hostage crisis.

If they neglect to mention this in the truthfile, it’s painting an unfair depiction of the election.

Like when David Duke was a nationally recognized “Republican” even though he’d been a Democrat politician, Independent Politician, and then Republican, and now Independent again. He’s still referred to as a former Republican or former Republican candidate.

It’ll be interesting to see what comes up in his background check. Then again, our own president was not vetted and aligned with some of the absolute worst domestic terrorist figures of the 1970s.


16 posted on 06/23/2009 12:10:26 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (There is no truth in the Pravda Media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson