Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Feminism Is Dead (Good Riddance)
Newsmax ^ | June 21, 2009 | S.E. Cupp

Posted on 06/21/2009 6:43:02 PM PDT by Al B.

Thank you, Barbara Boxer, for hammering the final nail in the coffin of angry and irrelevant pseudo-feminism. If there were any life left in its wheezing and flailing body, her latest experiment in the utterly ridiculous effectively pulled the plug.

The venomous brand of feminism that cuts men off at the knees to make women arbitrarily taller is no longer credible. When Boxer had the audacity – and some would argue, questionable mental clarity – to publicly scold a US Army general for calling her “ma’am” instead of “senator,” it telegraphed to the rest of the world the sheer inanity of today’s modern feminism, a rusting relic of the 60’s that’s been pushed so far to the extreme borders of relevance that it actually has Boxer hearing things. Yes, in today’s feminism, calling a woman “ma’am” is a mark of disrespect.

But calling another woman a “slutty flight attendant” is apparently hilarious. Never mind that the woman is a United States Governor, the first woman to hold that post in her state, and the youngest. Never mind that she’s an accomplished and hard-working, self-made woman and mother of five. Because she’s a Republican, she’s fair game for the lunatic left who, when it comes to Sarah Palin, seems to have forgotten their Feminism For Dummies handbook at their beach houses.

[...]

With Pelosi irrationally attacking the integrity of the CIA, and Boxer publicly criticizing an Army general for a totally imagined slight, it’s a wonder women are taken seriously at all anymore. And as one, I admit I’m more than a little embarrassed by their behavior. They do not speak for me.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 111th; boxer; civility; feminism; michaelwalsh; palin; radicalfeminists; rudedems
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last
To: SloopJohnB

Good idea. Or we could change NOW to THEN.


61 posted on 06/21/2009 8:20:04 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Ev Reeman

Boxer = Box-o-Rocks


62 posted on 06/21/2009 8:21:43 PM PDT by pankot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: gigster

I think she’s been on Hannity once or twice too...


63 posted on 06/21/2009 8:36:38 PM PDT by tina07 (In loving memory of my father,WWII Vet. CBI 10/16/42-12/17/45, d. 11/1/85 -Happy B'day Daddy 2/20/23)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: keats5
Smokin' Hot, as KTLK's Chris Baker would say.

But she's NOT an E cupp, despite her name.

Cheers!

64 posted on 06/21/2009 8:41:45 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: calex59

she’s on Red Eye a lot and also Hannity’s panel. She’s smart and attractive, she could be the future ex Mrs. Isom35.


65 posted on 06/21/2009 9:04:36 PM PDT by isom35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

Unfortunately yes, a lot of women fall for the mantra that is socialism. Sadly to their own demise, not to mention the demise of the family unit and the nation.

I sent S.E. a nice big THANK YOU!


66 posted on 06/21/2009 9:29:00 PM PDT by gidget7 (Duncan Hunter-Valley Forge Republican!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TheOldLady
Is it okay to comeback out of that closet now?

Stay right where you are, chauvy. We already have our hands full putting up with your female counterparts, the lunatic feminazies.

67 posted on 06/21/2009 9:30:11 PM PDT by IIntense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Al B.

I dunno

the media and academia continue to brainwash our youth unabated


68 posted on 06/21/2009 9:36:12 PM PDT by wardaddy (ASAP................As Southern As Possible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NellieMae

AMEN, Bless you for that Nellie. I couldn’t agree more.


69 posted on 06/21/2009 9:36:16 PM PDT by gidget7 (Duncan Hunter-Valley Forge Republican!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: calex59

SE is on Hannity a lot, and I have seen her on other FOXNEWS programs do. Gorgeous and smart, just like most conservative women. A young, strong conservative.


70 posted on 06/21/2009 9:38:27 PM PDT by gidget7 (Duncan Hunter-Valley Forge Republican!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: maica

All this showed was that Babs Boxers is TOTALLY IGNORANT of military culture and protocol.

In the military, everyone who is senior to you is addressed as either “sir” or “ma’am.”

If a private is addressing a female lieutenant, he says “yes, ma’am.” If a three-star general is addressing a four-star general, who happens to be female, the three-star general addresses the four-star general as “ma’am.” It is not only a sign of respect, it is utterly required by military culture.

So when this general called Babs “ma’am,” he did so solely and completely b/c, as a Senator, she “out-ranks” him, not technically, but in terms of protocol. In fact, to go out of his way to not call her “ma’am,” in military culture, would be a sign of disrespect.

For example, if a LT continually said “Yes, Captain” to a female CPT, rather than “yes, ma’am.”

Babs not only showed that feminazism is soooo 20th century, she demonstrated unequivocally that she is an ignoramus.


71 posted on 06/21/2009 9:49:58 PM PDT by fightinJAG (Good riddance, UAW.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Glenn
When women can be taught to think and speak clearly...

Whooa there. I am a woman who does not need to be taught how to think, to reason and to base my opinions on actual facts.

My point is: Please don't generalize---there are plenty of savvy women while there are also plenty of very stupid men.

Just a bit of advice---no "I'm sorry" required. You didn't insult me, you simply ignored the many intelligent and sensible women.

72 posted on 06/21/2009 9:59:44 PM PDT by IIntense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: gigster

As the comanchero said in “Outlaw Josey Wales”: “If one of ya has to, you can use that old woman over there. She’s worth maybe one donkey.”


73 posted on 06/21/2009 10:24:42 PM PDT by karnage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle
There's ALWAYS been something wrong with it.

From someone who's been an adult since back in the '60s, I saw trouble brewing from this movement. My first observation was that women who bought into NOW (National Organization for Women) gradually began taking needed jobs from men. From there we watched as women, including married women with children, were encouraged to educate themselves and become "career women". Not much, if any value was attached to a mother staying home and caring for her children, even infants.

When married women were able to bring home a very nice salary, they no longer were dependent on their husbands. As a result, his role as dad greatly changed.

The number of divorces skyrocked to about 50%, many children no longer live in a home with a mother and father, and many are forced to live, or spend time with, a parent and their significant other, like it or not.

I believe NOW and other organizations like it contributed greatly to these destructive results.

74 posted on 06/21/2009 10:41:52 PM PDT by IIntense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Al B.

bump


75 posted on 06/21/2009 10:42:45 PM PDT by dcwusmc (We need to make government so small that it can be drowned in a bathtub.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IIntense

I have female counterparts? Last time I looked, all my parts were already female. :-D


76 posted on 06/22/2009 2:32:51 AM PDT by TheOldLady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: TheOldLady
I've always been a male chauvinist.

I just took you at your word, despite your screen name. Must have missed something.LOL

77 posted on 06/22/2009 2:45:50 PM PDT by IIntense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: IIntense

;-D


78 posted on 06/22/2009 6:36:20 PM PDT by TheOldLady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: fightinJAG

she demonstrated unequivocally that she is an ignoramus.

@@@@

ABSOLUTELY! BOTH FEET IN MOUTH! She is dumb as a box of rocks!


79 posted on 06/22/2009 7:08:48 PM PDT by maica (Politics is not about facts. it is about what politicians can get people to believe. - Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: maica

Barbara boxer had no problem when Barack called her charming or “a Cutie”. She just as a problem with a General calling her Ma’am. I think she just doesn’t like being called “Late for Dinner”. See the youtube video

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SDjVrOqBPaQ


80 posted on 06/22/2009 7:55:18 PM PDT by karenfromny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson