Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Uh-oh, Cheerios -- The FDA says the cereal is a drug
Washington Times ^ | June 21, 2009

Posted on 06/21/2009 3:41:49 AM PDT by Zakeet

The latest verdict from the Food and Drug Administration is that Cheerios is a drug. Parents, then, must be drug pushers.

The FDA sent a warning to Cheerios maker General Mills Inc. that it is in serious violation of federal rules.

"Based on claims made on your product's label, we have determined that your Cheerios Toasted Whole Grain Oat Cereal is promoted for conditions that cause it to be a drug because the product is intended for use in the prevention, mitigation, and treatment of disease" the FDA letter said. "[Cheerios] may not be legally marketed with the above claims in the United States without an approved new drug application."

If the FDA were to win its enforcement action against Cheerios, all the boxes would have to be pulled from grocery-store shelves, and children could only get their morning "fixes" with a prescription from their doctors.

Two claims on the Cheerios cereal box upset the FDA: "Cheerios is clinically proven to reduce cholesterol 4 percent in 6 weeks" and, "Cheerios can help reduce the risk of coronary heart disease, by lowering the 'bad' cholesterol."

Susan Cruzan of the FDA's press office told The Washington Times the FDA is not objecting to the fact that clinical studies do, in fact, find that Cheerios do what General Mills claims. What concerns the FDA, according to Ms. Cruzan, is, "This is a food product, and they do have a health claim."

[Snip]

This is a prime example of the nanny state running amok. Only the government would work to classify a breakfast cereal as a drug for the offense of having correct information on its label.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cheerios; drug; fda; nannystate; regulation; washingtontimes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last
Oops. Looks like the answer could be that Quaker Oats jumped through the FDA's hoops, and General Mills/Cheerios didn't.

In 1995, Quaker Oats petitioned the FDA for approval for a "heart health" claim, which was received in 1997.

41 posted on 06/21/2009 6:06:11 AM PDT by MaggieCarta (We're all Detroiters now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: RobRoy
What food doesn’t have an implied health claim. If you eat it, your body can convert it’s content to something that ensures your ongoing health.

Thank you! Simply ingesting food itself, I'd like the FDA to explain how one can survive without eating, the ultimate in *health concerns*.

How is it possible that Wonder Bread ("Helps build bodies twelve ways") has managed to skate all these years? [/sarc]

42 posted on 06/21/2009 6:16:45 AM PDT by MozarkDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MaggieCarta
In 1995, Quaker Oats petitioned the FDA for approval for a "heart health" claim, which was received in 1997.

The FDA is looking for a bribe.

43 posted on 06/21/2009 6:29:47 AM PDT by Western Phil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
Food prevents starvation, therefore food is a drug.
Water prevents dehydration, therefore water is a drug.
Air prevents suffocation, therefore air is a drug.

Therefore, the FDA controls everything. Mission accomplished.

44 posted on 06/21/2009 7:10:08 AM PDT by CPOSharky (Barak al-DC. Barak al-Chicago, Barak al-Oahu. Barak al-Mombasa. What' it gonna be?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stevie_d_64

Yeah, I think you are onto something here. I look at it this way: These FDA folks are all human beings like us, which means they think at least SOMEWHAT like us. So, imagine yourself in one of those meetings where they discuss this, and someone in the room makes this “they are making a drug claim” comment. 30 years ago everyone in the room would have said the person was nuts. They already admitted the claim was absolutely true.

This is overly proactive nanny state protection. And there is almost certainly an ulterior motive.


45 posted on 06/21/2009 7:11:10 AM PDT by RobRoy (This too will pass. But it will hurt like a you know what.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

((Snicker)) to be taken with calcium..


46 posted on 06/21/2009 7:26:10 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8 (Please pray for our troops.... http://www.americasupportsyou.mil/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RobRoy

Advertisements and vitamins~
If cheerios had made the same “fda disclaimer” that other companies are forced to do, this wouldn’t have happened.


47 posted on 06/21/2009 7:40:49 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8 (Please pray for our troops.... http://www.americasupportsyou.mil/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Them General Mills boys must notta been supportin’ enough of The One last fall....


48 posted on 06/21/2009 7:46:41 AM PDT by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gieriscm

ping for government stupidity.


49 posted on 06/21/2009 7:54:15 AM PDT by BCR #226 (07/02 SOT www.extremefirepower.com...The BS stops when the hammer drops.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Well done.

I wonder who got a burr under their A__ for General Mills and Cheerios? It isn’t like this hasn’t been a claim for some time and it sure isn’t like the General Mills attorneys didn’t consider this before making the claims.


50 posted on 06/21/2009 7:57:25 AM PDT by Sequoyah101 (Half of the population is below average)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
Next up" PRUNES.

You know why.

If the FDA used them, we wouldn't have this problem.

51 posted on 06/21/2009 10:31:50 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Western Phil
The FDA is looking for a bribe.

I think so, too. Probably Cheerios didn't "apply" (read: send in the "application fee") to the FDA, as Quaker did.

Of course, there is the unhappy possibility that I could be wrong.

52 posted on 06/21/2009 11:03:14 AM PDT by MaggieCarta (We're all Detroiters now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: FunkyZero

Hide the TV remotes...

It has worked wonders for me...You can’t even see the bruises anymore...;-)


53 posted on 06/21/2009 11:17:06 AM PDT by stevie_d_64
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

What’s next? “Milk - it does a body good.”

http://www.retrojunk.com/details_commercial/161/


54 posted on 06/21/2009 2:00:55 PM PDT by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
But is it a generic drug ?
55 posted on 06/21/2009 2:16:21 PM PDT by JeepInMazar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson