Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind
Why does the universe seem so fine-tuned for the emergence of life How do we know that it is? The only evidence of life is here on Earth leaving billions and trillions of planets and star systems undiscovered. If life isn't on any of them then this Universe is most definitely not fine tuned for life.
6 posted on 06/20/2009 10:16:08 AM PDT by aft_lizard (One animal actually eats its own brains to conserve energy, we call them liberals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: aft_lizard

The premise of the fine-tuned universe assertion is that a small change in several of the approximately 26 dimensionless fundamental physical constants would make the universe radically different: if, for example, the strong nuclear force were 2% stronger than it is (i.e. if the coupling constant representing its strength were 2% larger), diprotons would be stable and hydrogen would fuse into them instead of deuterium and helium. This would drastically alter the physics of stars, and presumably prevent the universe from developing life as it is currently observed on the earth.

The small value of the cosmological constant is telling us that a remarkably precise and totally unexpected relation exists among all the parameters of the Standard Model of particle physics, the bare cosmological constant and unknown physics.”

Astrophycisit John Polkinghorne ( now an Anglican priest) formulates the fine-tuning in terms of six principal constants:

1. N - the ratio of the strength of the electrical forces and the strength of gravity

2. Epsilon - defining how firmly atomic nuclei bind together

3. Omega - which measures the relative importance of gravity and expansion energy in the universe

4. Lambda - the “Cosmological Constant”

5. Q - the ratio of the gravitational energy required to pull galaxies apart and their mass

6. D - the number of space-like dimensions in the universe

The arguments relating to the fine-tuned universe concept involve the anthropic principle, which states that any valid theory of the universe must be consistent with our existence as human beings at this particular time and place in the universe. In other words, even if the actual probability of our universe that supports intelligent life may be very low, the conditional probability of supporting intelligent life, given our existence in it, is 1. Even if there could be other universes, less “fine-tuned” and so devoid of life, there would be no one there to observe them.


12 posted on 06/20/2009 10:25:10 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: aft_lizard

Yup. There is a deeper question, too: The universe is very finely tuned for there to even be matter and energy, and on top of that for their to be “clumpiness” (ie, not a uniform blob), and there’s more. But all the necessary constants just HAPPENED to work out perectly for this all to happen. /sarc


15 posted on 06/20/2009 10:33:34 AM PDT by piytar (Take back the language: Obama axing Chrystler dealers based on political donations is REAL fascism!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson