Posted on 06/19/2009 2:02:27 PM PDT by wagglebee
NEW YORK, NY, June 19, 2009 (C-FAM) - A year-and-a-half after the "Global 'Safe Abortion'" conference took place in London, abortion advocates Marie Stopes International and Ipas just released the conference report detailing the abortion movements worldwide strategy.
While organizers claimed that the primary objective of the conference was to "save women's lives and reduce maternal mortality," the report reveals that participants prioritized a so-called "right" to "safe and legal abortion" above all else dismissing any evidence of its harmful effects on women and even denying the right of conscientious medical professionals to object to participating in abortions.
The 800 conference participants, culled from the world's major abortion advocacy groups, crafted and signed the "Global Call to Action for Womens Access to Safe Abortion" demanding that women everywhere "have full access to legal, voluntary, safe, and affordable abortions as part of comprehensive sexual and reproductive health care." The Call to Action also demanded that governments reform their laws and policies "at all levels" to ensure "rights to contraception and safe abortion," and that medical schools provide "physicians, nurses, midwives, and other healthcare workers" with abortion training.
Presenters lamented that even where abortion is legal, there are technical and policy barriers to contend with, such as shortages of trained, authorized healthcare personnel, particularly in rural areas. Strategies to address this lack of access to abortion focused on training non-physician "mid-level providers," such as nurses and midwives, and promoting "medication abortion" to "facilitate" the "expulsion of uterine contents," as well as undermining conscience protections relied on by physicians, nurses and other health care workers opposed to taking unborn life.
Advocates were encouraged to press for greater liberalization where abortion is permitted "to preserve the womans health" by urging abortionists to argue that abortion was necessary to achieve the World Health Organizations definition of health as a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity.
Apart from pushing for legalization, conference participants were urged to argue for the broadest interpretation of existing laws and policies and attack "other medically unnecessary administrative constraints that hinder access," such as requirements for spousal and parental consent and multiple physician authorizations. They were also urged to combat pro-lifers success in linking pregnancy termination to cancer, infertility and severe psychological trauma.
While those involved in the conference purported to help women by lowering maternal mortality through legalizing abortion, a new publication from National Right to Life (NRLC) points out that the lack of modern medicine and quality health care, not the prohibition of abortion, "results in high maternal mortality rates." Contrary to "safe abortion" advocates claims, NRLC argues that liberalization "in the developing world, where maternal health care is poor, [...] would increase the number of women who die or are harmed by abortion."
Indeed, a recent United Nations treaty body submission by the pro-abortion Center for Reproductive Rights (CRR) conceded that the nation of Sri Lanka had made great strides in lowering maternal mortality while retaining laws penalizing abortion that CRR considers among the worlds most restrictive.
Their goal is to force ALL physicians to perform abortions on demand.
Pro-Life Ping
Freepmail wagglebee or DirtyHarryY2K to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
No, really? Who'da thunkit? I'll bet they've done something about sanitary water supply and having obstetrical workers wash their hands.
It would not hurt a few of the Right to Life organiztions to run a commerical on radio and TV - in places where the masses look not on Rush or JCTV, and mention that in times of short money, in the treasury, the US taxpayer is spending billions for abortions!! Is that the kind of foreign aid needed in Africa or Mexico? If the folks want an abortion let their county pay for it!!
They know they won’t do that, but that they could succeed in forcing the conscientious people out of the biz. Instant crisis, ready to be exploited to liberal ends to the full.
For any Democrat 18 years or older.
Their unborn children, however, are off-limits.
And what do they plan to do to the people that will continue to refuse to perform abortions? Throw them in jail, fine them? Lord, please come back and get us soon!
Gee, is abortion safe for the baby?
What a hilarious headline.
Please FreepMail me if you want on or off my Pro-Life Ping List.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.