Skip to comments.
Reader's Digest: Back to the Future?
National Review Online ^
| 6.19.09
| John J. Miller
Posted on 06/19/2009 12:26:17 PM PDT by rvoitier
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-39 last
To: Gerish
Stop subscribing years ago - half the pages were drugs ads with two pages of explanation, such a waste. Take two minutes to tear out all the drug ads--every ad, for that matter--and the magazine is pretty good. It's still quite conservative, comparatively.
I like RD, and am a continuing happy subscriber.
21
posted on
06/19/2009 1:27:36 PM PDT
by
TChris
(There is no freedom without the possibility of failure.)
To: Ruy Dias de Bivar
I leared German by reading the German version of Reader's Digest) ("Das Beste auf Reader's Digest"). I found their version of "Buy-Words from Carolyn Davis" to be particularly enlightening. In German it was called "Einkauf-bummeln mit Angelika", or "Window-Shopping With Angelika", more or less.
22
posted on
06/19/2009 1:28:45 PM PDT
by
B-Chan
To: rvoitier
PRAISE GOD.
One of the things I’ve greatly deplored in recent years is their being co-opted by the oligarchy.
Sounds like at least some return to basic values.
Yea!
23
posted on
06/19/2009 1:31:54 PM PDT
by
Quix
(POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
To: Jemian
If the reboot is simply a case of liberals putting out a magazine that they think will win over conservatives, then the Digest will continue its sad and drawn-out death spiral.
Businesses have cultures. The RD had a conservative culture, but that has been dissipated. An editor who has a photo of Barak Obama over her desk can try to fake it, but in the long run cannot consistently project conservatism in a way that FReepers will identify with. Unless in the process the Obama photo goes away out of conviction. The old Reader's Digest made The Road to Serfdom and F A Hayek.
24
posted on
06/19/2009 1:36:00 PM PDT
by
conservatism_IS_compassion
(The conceit of journalistic objectivity is profoundly subversive of democratic principle.)
To: Squantos
If they had a Kindle edition I’d subscribe.
25
posted on
06/19/2009 1:43:50 PM PDT
by
Ramius
(Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
To: Ramius
Will that read pdf e- book editions ? If so send em a note like I did. I get a few of my favorite magazines in such a manner and like that better than their print versions. Not as glossy and such yet I can print em out each month and kill a tree myself !........:o)
26
posted on
06/19/2009 1:47:49 PM PDT
by
Squantos
(Be polite. Be professional. But have a plan to kill everyone you meet)
To: Richard Kimball
If the editor has a picture of 0bama in her office, Im passing. ROTFL! I'll bet a bunch of us will be one-issue readers, meaning, they'll have the obligatory photo of one of the Obamas (probably Michelle) and zap! That'll be the only issue we'll turn a page on.
It used to be a good read years ago. I can't see them going back to coservative format, not in today's world.
27
posted on
06/19/2009 1:50:32 PM PDT
by
brushcop
(SFC Sallie, CPL Long, LTHarris, SSG Brown, PVT Simmons KIA OIF lll&V, they died for you, honor them)
To: Squantos
yes... the Kindle will read e-Books, pdf files, word docs and flat text files.
28
posted on
06/19/2009 1:50:37 PM PDT
by
Ramius
(Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
To: Ruy Dias de Bivar
$2.10 an hour! In the 1950s? In this area ag workers got .25 cents an hour!What he said!
I made $1.10 an hour in '72 forking out the stalls of 90 1000 lb. Hereford steers. And was thrilled to have the job.
On the bright side, I can still spot B.S. from a mile away.
To: rvoitier
I logged on to their web page, and there is a political blog. The latest entry is “Americans Still Dream Big”, and discusses a survey naming America’s biggest dreamers. “President Obama won in a landslide with 33 percent, benefiting from both the present-tense language of the poll question, and by the fact that Americans historically invest in their presidents their own hopes and dreams.” (EXCERPT FROM THE BLOG). Others on the list include George Washington; Benjamin Franklin; Abe Lincoln; Ronald Reagan (my favorite); George W. Bush; JFK; Thomas Jefferson; God; and a few others. So, from the website, I cannot tell if they lean to the left or to the right!
To: Ruy Dias de Bivar
It was the early 1980s! He started me out at $2.00 an hour and after one year raised it to $2.10.
As far as I know the minimum wage doesn't apply to farmer workers.
31
posted on
06/19/2009 2:13:51 PM PDT
by
warsaw44
To: jwparkerjr
Life in These United States, Humor in Uniform
I remember those well! I really enjoyed them.
32
posted on
06/19/2009 2:15:47 PM PDT
by
warsaw44
To: rvoitier
My gripe with Reader’s Digest was that despite a two year subscription, I still got monthly notices to “renew now”, as well as phone calls asking me to extend the subscription. Finally, I told them to stick it. The magazine was fine. Their subscription harassment was a pain. I no longer subscribe.
33
posted on
06/19/2009 2:44:41 PM PDT
by
shortstop
(FUBO)
To: rvoitier
Wait a minute. Did you read the whole thing? The editor is a liberal who has a framed picture Barack Oh!Baby! in her office. This isn't going to be a conservative magazine, this is going to be a liberal’s idea of what conservatives want. Maybe they'll include squirrel recipes. I'm going to take a wait and see attitude.
34
posted on
06/19/2009 3:16:35 PM PDT
by
Excellence
(What Madoff is to finance Gore is to global warming.)
To: DJ MacWoW
35
posted on
06/19/2009 5:57:55 PM PDT
by
TASMANIANRED
(TAZ:Untamed, Unpredictable, Uninhibited.)
To: Excellence
No, I didn't read the whole article. Damn!
Thanks for the heads up.
To the new editor:
If it's not in your heart
It'll make me fart
36
posted on
06/19/2009 6:03:32 PM PDT
by
rvoitier
To: TASMANIANRED
Sadly it really doesn’t sound as if they are really returning to what they were.
37
posted on
06/19/2009 6:33:30 PM PDT
by
DJ MacWoW
(Make yourselves sheep and the wolves will eat you. Ben Franklin)
To: rvoitier
Thanks for your post of this article. I remember (over 30+ years ago) when the Reader's Digest publications used to look like this (below):
The design that was on the front wound around to the back cover. The articles were wholesome and WORTH reading (sigh).
38
posted on
06/20/2009 11:37:18 AM PDT
by
ConservativeStLouisGuy
(11th FReeper Commandment: Thou Shalt Not Unnecessarily Excerpt)
To: warsaw44
I remember they had a humor columnist named Will Stanton that was one of the funniest people I’ve ever read, as good as Dave Barry or Patrick McManus.
I wonder whatever happened to him?
Ed
39
posted on
06/20/2009 5:45:02 PM PDT
by
Sir_Ed
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-39 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson