Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Too Big to Fail' Doctrine Must End: FDIC's Bair
CNBC ^ | 19 Jun 2009 | JeeYeon Park

Posted on 06/19/2009 12:20:28 PM PDT by Lorianne

Ending the idea that large financial institutions are “too big to fail” is a top priority under the Obama administration’s regulatory reform proposal, said Sheila Bair, chairman of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.

“Clearly, there has been moral hazard and lack of market discipline fed by the 'too big to fail' doctrine, and this in turn has been fed by the lack of resolution mechanism that really works for very large financial organizations and this has been a central focus of ours,” Bair said in an interview on CNBC.

President Barack Obama's sweeping plan to reform financial regulation, which was unveiled on Wednesday, included a proposal to make the FDIC the resolution authority responsible for unwinding troubled financial firms.

“[The FDIC] is guaranteeing over $6 trillion right now,” she said. “The FDIC has tremendous exposure to the system so we would like a real say on systemic risk issues. [Reform overhaul] is an institutional issue, not a turf issue or a personality issue.”

(Excerpt) Read more at cnbc.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government
KEYWORDS: banking; bho44; fdic; sheilabair

1 posted on 06/19/2009 12:20:28 PM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Depressing


2 posted on 06/19/2009 12:23:20 PM PDT by wastedyears (Rock and roll ain't worth the name if it don't make ya strut)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Our entire economy is a great house of cards. We have an invisible knife at our throats - breathtaking fiscal and monetary indiscipline.


3 posted on 06/19/2009 12:25:50 PM PDT by americanophile (Sarcasm: satirical wit depending for its effect on bitter, caustic, and often ironic language.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

So, by making them small enough to fail, they will be guaranteed to fail as they won’t have the scale needed to function as major international banks.


4 posted on 06/19/2009 12:30:58 PM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
Misleading title.

“We suggest that for very large financial organizations including bank holding companies, Congress should consider creating a fund—just as we do with a deposit insurance fund–that could be set up [for firms] that have risk-based assessments," she said. "So if an institution is extremely large, interconnected or imposes a risk to the system—they would pay a higher assessment.”

The asinine "too big to fail" doctrine is in no way being threatened by BO et al. In fact, they are taking the TBTF doctrine to the next level, by enumerating the defining conditions and subsequently calling for the collection of funds to make the socialization of risk official policy. TBTF doctrine (bailouts only for the super high-value) will be chiseled into law, while conditions are put in place to prevent upstarts from ever getting TBTF. Goldman Sachs and the rest of the gang are gaining guaranteed future market share in return for a fee, all while the sheeple are led to believe it is being done for our own protection.


5 posted on 06/19/2009 12:33:55 PM PDT by M203M4 (A rainbow-excreting government-cheese-pie-eating unicorn in every pot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: M203M4
Goldman Sachs and the rest of the gang are gaining guaranteed future market share in return for a fee, all while the sheeple are led to believe it is being done for our own protection.

If the text books weren't rewritten by leftists this would be textbook fascism. But for the last 40 years fascism=right wing. The lemmings have no idea what's coming.

6 posted on 06/19/2009 12:42:54 PM PDT by douginthearmy (Until I get the proper order at the drive-thru, the unemployment rate is too LOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
A financial institution that is “too big to fail”, should be considered too big to be allowed to continue, and ordered broken up into lots of little pieces.

If Uncle Sam is going to guarantee an institution, it should dictate the maximum size institution it will cover.

7 posted on 06/19/2009 12:49:32 PM PDT by PapaBear3625 (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money -- Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson