Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dayglored

Quess she should have paid .99 per song. She shouldn’t have her life ruined because of this. A little too nazi for me. It will probably be thrown out, but will cost her big bucks for attorneys.


15 posted on 06/18/2009 6:38:48 PM PDT by mefistofelerevised
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: mefistofelerevised
> Quess she should have paid .99 per song. She shouldn’t have her life ruined because of this. A little too nazi for me.

Well, her "crime" was the sharing, more than just the downloading. It's harsh as hell, because the RIAA didn't have to prove that anybody else even got a copy via her shares. They only had to prove "intent".

> It will probably be thrown out, but will cost her big bucks for attorneys.

I suspect it already has, though probably there are some pockets helping her out.

28 posted on 06/18/2009 6:45:54 PM PDT by dayglored (Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: mefistofelerevised
It will probably be thrown out, but will cost her big bucks for attorneys.

Her attorneys are working for free. They are part of a group that is against the RIAA. They advanced some strange theories, but I think the judge was against Thomas.

He let in MediaSentry's evidence on a technicality. Their actions were illegal under Minnesota's law, but since they were in another state he said that didn't apply. I think by investigating someone in a state by directly connecting to her computer you are automatically operating in that state. This case would have fallen apart without that evidence.

133 posted on 06/19/2009 7:54:16 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson