Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S.Military Tracking North Korean Ship Suspected of Proliferating Missiles, Nukes
FOX ^

Posted on 06/18/2009 11:12:50 AM PDT by Sub-Driver

U.S.Military Tracking North Korean Ship Suspected of Proliferating Missiles, Nukes A ship named Kang Nam left a port in North Korea Wednesday and could be carrying missile parts or nuclear materials in violation of a U.N. Security Council resolution.

FOXNews.com

Thursday, June 18, 2009

The U.S. military is tracking a flagged North Korean ship suspected of proliferating weapons material in violation of a U.N. Security Council resolution passed last Friday, FOX News has learned.

The ship, Kang Nam, left a port in North Korea Wednesday and could be carrying weaponry, missile parts or nuclear materials. The U.S. military has been tracking it since its departure.

"It is believed to be 'of interest,'" a senior U.S. official told FOX News.

This is the first suspected "proliferator"

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; US: Hawaii
KEYWORDS: bho44; bhoasia; bhonukes; kangnam; nknukes; shipmovement; usmilitary; usnavy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last
Nothing will happen..........
1 posted on 06/18/2009 11:12:51 AM PDT by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I was just about to post this- Admiral McMullen and Sec Def Gates were just on TV in a press conference.

They can’t let them get away with this.

More coming on FOX shortly.


2 posted on 06/18/2009 11:14:23 AM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator

This needs to be in breaking news...


3 posted on 06/18/2009 11:14:59 AM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Why do I think North Korea would love for a US ship to stop this ship?


4 posted on 06/18/2009 11:15:03 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I don’t care if they find a working bomb that’s on a timer addressed to the port of Los Angeles. It will never become public knowledge. Obama needs this like he needs a bag of snakes in his bathroom.

He’s in so far over his head, he can’t even see the surface anymore. We are FUBAR.


5 posted on 06/18/2009 11:15:29 AM PDT by Big_Monkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo; TigerLikesRooster

ping


6 posted on 06/18/2009 11:16:02 AM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

One Mk48 torpedo, set off deep underneath ship, boyles law takes effect.


7 posted on 06/18/2009 11:18:53 AM PDT by edcoil (Reality doesn't have to say much.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Better for us to watch where it’s going, & then deal with both ends of the transaction.


8 posted on 06/18/2009 11:20:11 AM PDT by NativeNewYorker (Freepin' Jew Boy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Too bad we can’t stop the thing and board it but they already said they won’t board any ships. We’re so screwed.


9 posted on 06/18/2009 11:21:38 AM PDT by b4its2late (I love defenseless animals, especially in a good gravy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

The timing of this is perfect, this has to be a setup by the NorKs.


10 posted on 06/18/2009 11:22:32 AM PDT by Abathar (Proudly posting without reading the article carefully since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

IIRC, the Security Council made sure nothing will happen.


11 posted on 06/18/2009 11:22:59 AM PDT by NonValueAdded ("I've conquered my goddam willpower." Don Marquis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

12 posted on 06/18/2009 11:24:11 AM PDT by paulycy (Liberal DOUBLE-STANDARDS are HATE speech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I wonder how close a nuclear blast would have to be to case an EMP-like event over or near Hawaii.


13 posted on 06/18/2009 11:24:23 AM PDT by ChocChipCookie (Survival is a Mom's Job! Check out my new blog: www.thesurvivalmom.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Obama right now is swearing up a storm: “who da hell let the news of that ship out. now dey gonna expect me to do sumtin ‘bout it.”


14 posted on 06/18/2009 11:24:43 AM PDT by HD1200
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HD1200

Nothing will be done about it.


15 posted on 06/18/2009 11:26:22 AM PDT by Oldexpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

bookmark


16 posted on 06/18/2009 11:26:49 AM PDT by mmichaels1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abathar

I am betting this might just be the first one that some brave person in the military or CIA decided to leak to the press.

There might have been more Obama & Panetta “allowed” to proceed “undiscovered” to avoid having to make a decision.


17 posted on 06/18/2009 11:27:06 AM PDT by HD1200
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I wonder if a ship named Kang Nam could be the tripwire for WW3?


18 posted on 06/18/2009 11:29:02 AM PDT by GeronL (http://libertyfic.proboards.com <----go there now,----> tyrannysentinel.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhombus

Could easily be a trick


19 posted on 06/18/2009 11:29:36 AM PDT by GeronL (http://libertyfic.proboards.com <----go there now,----> tyrannysentinel.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

The only “tracking” this vessel requires is in support of the firing solution from the nearest in-range anti-ship missile system.

Figure the odds...


20 posted on 06/18/2009 11:31:30 AM PDT by Bean Counter (Stout Hearts....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson