Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tacticalogic
"I'll stand by my original statement. If the decay slows down, the reaction doesn't produce enough power - power is also time based. If it speeds up it will melt the containment - the cooling systems that keep it from doing this are equally time based, being dependent on how much coolant they can move through the system and as a direct function how much heat they can remove in a given amount of time."

Again, you are assuming that radioactive decay energies are variable in dynamic time. That may not be the case but the method used to measure time prevents that from being measured. That was the point of post #27.

Ignoring the truth doesn't help.

65 posted on 06/18/2009 10:10:33 AM PDT by GourmetDan (Eccl 10:2 - The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: GourmetDan
That may not be the case but the method used to measure time prevents that from being measured. That was the point of post #27.

Then we have just as much evidence to support that as we do to support the assertion that the decay rate varies.

72 posted on 06/18/2009 10:19:23 AM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson