To: GourmetDan
That may not be the case but the method used to measure time prevents that from being measured. That was the point of post #27. Then we have just as much evidence to support that as we do to support the assertion that the decay rate varies.
72 posted on
06/18/2009 10:19:23 AM PDT by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: tacticalogic
"Then we have just as much evidence to support that as we do to support the assertion that the decay rate varies." Wrong.
Dynamic time is measured separately from radiometric time.
That was the point of post #27.
74 posted on
06/18/2009 10:21:40 AM PDT by
GourmetDan
(Eccl 10:2 - The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson