Journal of Creation = Peer Reviewed.
Answers Research Journal = Peer Reviewed
Creation Research Society = Peer Reviewed
Baraminology Study Group = Peer Reviewed
Etc, etc, etc...and IMHO, they are far superior to the so-called “science” journals put out by the Temple of Darwinistic Materialism.
No, none are peer reviewed by actual scientist, perhaps “reviewed” only “creation scientists” who have a very predictable check list.
Let’s be clear the “peer” group for “creation science” are a playgroup of wannabe scientists who fail to achieve. So, if we are playing semantic games - and of course, semantic games are a big part of “creation science” then we could fabricate a means of “peer review”.
Peer review means exactly what you know it means. NO creation science journal, paper, or research is ever peer reviewed by anyone with actual achievement and accomplishment in any scientific field. If the article you posted was peer reviewed by anyone but the authors toddler granddaughter I would be amazed.
“Etc, etc, etc...and IMHO, they are far superior to the so-called “science” journals put out by the Temple of Darwinistic Materialism.”
Why? becausea they don’t conclude every article & research paper with “therefore the bible is literally correct”?
>>Journal of Creation = Peer Reviewed.
Answers Research Journal = Peer Reviewed
Creation Research Society = Peer Reviewed
Baraminology Study Group = Peer Reviewed
Etc, etc, etc...and IMHO, they are far superior to the so-called “science” journals put out by the Temple of Darwinistic Materialism.<<
BUAHAHA — please post the names and dates of the scientific journals these peer reviews took place.
(Please wait a minute while I get some popcorn — do you like extra butter? I use real butter not that toxic mix they use at movie theaters).