Skip to comments.
H.I.V. Found in 22 Actors in Sex Films Since 2004
New York Times ^
| June 12, 2009
| Gardiner Harris
Posted on 06/14/2009 6:14:51 AM PDT by Zakeet
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
OSHA to investigate these lost time accidents?
Actors eligible for worker's comp?
Double standard at work?
1
posted on
06/14/2009 6:14:51 AM PDT
by
Zakeet
To: Zakeet
employer? talent?
Its sad they got the disease. Its sad they are in this ‘profession.’
2
posted on
06/14/2009 6:18:51 AM PDT
by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: Zakeet
:the state had a difficult time cracking down.”
Guess they will have to try harder from now on!!!!
3
posted on
06/14/2009 6:19:59 AM PDT
by
WKB
(From "Handout" to "Bailout")
To: Zakeet
The govenment is going to waste time and money on the wasted? Porn ‘industry’ ‘workers’ are pure garbage. Let them get sick and die. Who cares?!
4
posted on
06/14/2009 6:21:55 AM PDT
by
mefistofelerevised
(M SURE THERE IS A NOBLE LLAWYER SOMEWHE)
To: mefistofelerevised
they could be worse, they could be working for the government. at least they produce something that helps the economy
To: Zakeet
Safety standards are out the window and the workers get screwed again. Same old story.
6
posted on
06/14/2009 6:27:20 AM PDT
by
BipolarBob
(It takes a Kenyan village to raise a US president.)
To: robertwalker62
You are right. Even prostitutes are higher up the latter of virtue than the government thieves.
7
posted on
06/14/2009 6:27:33 AM PDT
by
Soothesayer
(The United States of America Rest in Peace November 4 2008)
To: Zakeet
Message to “actors” in “sex films”....you reap what you sow.
To: robertwalker62
At least they are in to produce something (dubious at times) and seek for profit. In that light, I hold them in slightly higher regard as an industry.
9
posted on
06/14/2009 6:28:19 AM PDT
by
wally_bert
(My doctor says that I have a malformed public-duty gland and a natural deficiency in moral fibre)
To: robertwalker62
If you don’t like Government Programs, that is OK but not all government workers fit your perception. So, I must conclude based on your entire statement that you are pro-porn
10
posted on
06/14/2009 6:28:37 AM PDT
by
Tuketu
(GOP, state you will reverse all 0bama Dictatorial / DemZI decrees and laws)
To: WKB
Quit “poking” fun at them.
11
posted on
06/14/2009 6:29:03 AM PDT
by
central_va
(www.15thVirginia.org Co. C, Patrick Henry Rifles)
To: Zakeet
Clearly this is a crisis that needs direct oversight. Time for the President to take over this industry and manage it himself. Then we need a czar.
12
posted on
06/14/2009 6:30:24 AM PDT
by
lurk
To: Zakeet
Perhaps I missed it but 22 positives means nothing if we don’t know how many were tested. 22 out of ? could be above or below the average for beekeepers, Trappist monks or rodeo clowns or any other profession.
13
posted on
06/14/2009 6:31:49 AM PDT
by
muir_redwoods
( Hey, remember the last head of state who dictated the design of automobiles?)
To: Zakeet
Isn’t this like reporting a drunk at a bar?
14
posted on
06/14/2009 6:32:36 AM PDT
by
70th Division
(I love my country but fear my government!)
To: robertwalker62
Oh, I must have gotten confused. I though the porn industry was the goverment.
Everytime I get letters from the government I feel like I’m bending over and getting ......, well, you know what
I mean.
15
posted on
06/14/2009 6:32:48 AM PDT
by
mefistofelerevised
(M SURE THERE IS A NOBLE LLAWYER SOMEWHE)
To: Zakeet
Excuse me, I am supposed to care?
16
posted on
06/14/2009 6:36:27 AM PDT
by
Ditter
To: central_va
One never knows where these things will end up!!!
17
posted on
06/14/2009 6:39:26 AM PDT
by
WKB
(From "Handout" to "Bailout")
To: muir_redwoods
Thank you! I was wondering if any one else would notice.
To: Zakeet
They dont provide that to us. They're not allowed to. Violation of confidentiality. And I wouldn't be surprised if faggots pushed for that one.
19
posted on
06/14/2009 6:43:41 AM PDT
by
LouAvul
To: Zakeet
> But Deborah Gold, a senior safety engineer with the California occupational health department, said violations in the pornography industry were so widespread that the state had a difficult time cracking down.
I don't understand. If we're talking about the porn industry, then surely the authorities have PHOTOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE to go on. How difficult can it be to crack down on parties whom you've got live on film in the very act, in flagrante delicto?
20
posted on
06/14/2009 6:43:53 AM PDT
by
DieHard the Hunter
(Is mise an ceann-cinnidh. Cha ghéill mi do dhuine. Fà g am bealach.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson