Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Peter Hitchens: You can't hear the jackboots, but this is still oppression
The Daily Mail ^ | June 13, 2009 | Peter Hitchens

Posted on 06/13/2009 5:23:06 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

We used to think that Communism would arrive in this country on the bayonets of Soviet soldiers, if it came at all. We never realised that it would instead materialise amid our freedom and prosperity, step by tiny step, in the form of bureaucratic interference and political correctness.

As one of the few British people who has actually lived in a Communist country (Moscow in the early Nineties, since you ask), I know better than most what such societies feel like, and how they work. And in the past two weeks I have seen several developments in Britain which seem strangely familiar.

The first was a proposal to refuse school places to children who had not been given the MMR injection. I have no idea if the MMR is safe or not. But I know many thoughtful and well-informed people who believe that it damaged their children, or fear that it might do so. A free country would not blackmail individuals in this way.

The next was a sinister report from the 'Department for Children' demanding that prying officials be empowered to force their way into the homes of parents who prefer to educate their sons and daughters at home.

This is our all-powerful State's angry response to a growing rebellion, by mothers and fathers who are sick of seeing their children bullied, neglected and miseducated in the state education system, and rightly think they can do a better job. How can the commissars in charge of the Western world's worst schools be fit to judge how well a parent is teaching her own child? The pretext for this invasion of privacy is a baseless suggestion that home education could be used as a cover for child abuse.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: 111th; agenda; bho44; bigbrother; communism; education; families; hitchens; homeschoolers; homeschooling; nannystate; second100days; socialism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last
Sound familiar?
1 posted on 06/13/2009 5:23:07 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

It’s here.


2 posted on 06/13/2009 5:28:35 PM PDT by Carley (OBAMA IS A MALEVOLENT FORCE IN THE WORLD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
When they came for the home-schoolers,
I did nothing, for I was not homeschooling...
3 posted on 06/13/2009 5:34:00 PM PDT by sionnsar (IranAzadi|5yst3m 0wn3d-it's N0t Y0ur5:SONY|"AlsoSprachTelethustra"-NonValueAdded|Lk21:36|FireTheLiar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

4 posted on 06/13/2009 5:34:11 PM PDT by GreyMountainReagan (Liberals do not view the book 1984 as a warning but as a textbook.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sionnsar
When they came for the home-schoolers,
I did nothing, for I was not homeschooling...

First they came for the smokers,
But I did nothing for I was not a smoker...

5 posted on 06/13/2009 5:43:13 PM PDT by OrangeHoof (YES WE CAN have a Depression.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
This sound familiar? Sign of things to come here?

Jail terms overturned, LE 20,000 fine upheld in ‘four editors’ case

CAIRO: The Cairo Appeals Court overturned a one-year jail sentence and upheld a LE 20,000 fine for each of the four newspaper editors convicted for insulting President Hosni Mubarak and defaming government officials.The four editors of opposition and independent newspapers received a one-year jail sentences and a LE 20,000 fine in September 2007 after the court found them guilty of “publishing false information likely to disturb public order.” The case was brought by two lawyers affiliated with the ruling National Democratic Party (NDP) against...

Read More... http://www.dailystaregypt.com/

NOTE: (ruling National Democratic Party (NDP)

Excerpt: In a separate case, Eissa was sentenced in March to six months in prison for reporting on rumors about the president's health. The sentence was later reduced to two months and then scrapped when he received a pardon directly from President Mubarak in October 2008.

wonder what "false" information and how Mubarak's health was around that time.

6 posted on 06/13/2009 5:46:33 PM PDT by TribalPrincess2U (The plan... 0 in power for life. At least that's what they told him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

A truly free country wouldn’t have a socialized government school system. Then you could have schools that require inoculation and schools that don’t. If it’s important to you, send your kids to the non-inoculation school.


7 posted on 06/13/2009 5:49:00 PM PDT by Jabba the Nutt (Are they insane, stupid or just evil?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OrangeHoof

When they came for the vapers, I did nothing because I was not a vaper.


8 posted on 06/13/2009 5:53:15 PM PDT by RandallFlagg (30-year smoker, E-Cigs helped me quit, and O wants me back smoking again?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
How can the commissars in charge of the Western world's worst schools be fit to judge...

Wait a minute. I thought America had the Western world's worst schools!

Since when did Great Britain ace us out for that honor?

9 posted on 06/13/2009 6:01:42 PM PDT by Gritty (Small government gives you big freedoms. Big government leaves you very little freedom-Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Seems bloody unlikely that they’d dare encroach on the privacy of Muslim homeschoolers. UK authorities tend to fold like a cheap suit when dealing with the children of Allah.


10 posted on 06/13/2009 6:11:24 PM PDT by Pallas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

All this and barely a whimper from the clueless and unwashed amongst us. Welcome to Germany 1932.


11 posted on 06/13/2009 6:12:10 PM PDT by ExTexasRedhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jabba the Nutt

Nope, in a free society NO schools would require inoculation but would provide it if the parents decided that is was good for their children. For inoculations that truly help, education is the answer, not force.


12 posted on 06/13/2009 6:24:21 PM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

TINY step? Those steps ain’t so tiny.


13 posted on 06/13/2009 6:49:46 PM PDT by GOP Poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

This guy is good. I haven’t read him before. At first, when I saw his name, I thought Christopher Hitchens.


14 posted on 06/13/2009 7:00:07 PM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

His brother, IIRC.


15 posted on 06/13/2009 7:01:24 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet ("The unarmed man is not just defenseless - he is also contemptible." Machiavelli)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
The pretext for this invasion of privacy is a baseless suggestion that home education could be used as a cover for child abuse.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Why are they only concerned about school-aged children?

If they are sooooooo concerned about child abuse, why not take newborns from their mother's arms in the delivery room? Raise them in government school orphanages.

Hey! It's in the child's best interest because some parents might abuse their children. (/sarc)

16 posted on 06/13/2009 7:10:39 PM PDT by wintertime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wintertime

That’s what the National Socialists (Nazis) or Reds would do.


17 posted on 06/13/2009 7:15:30 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet ("The unarmed man is not just defenseless - he is also contemptible." Machiavelli)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: calex59
Nope, in a free society NO schools would require inoculation but would provide it if the parents decided that is was good for their children.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

I say, “OK! Don't immunize your child,..but...be prepared to pay damages if your child infects another child.”

Any parent who does NOT immunize their child should be sued in court for damages if the non-imunized child gets sick and passes around the community.

Even though children are immunized, a certain percentage will not develop antibodies. So...If a non-immunized child gets sick he can infect a child who has been immunized but whose body did not develop the antibodies against the disease.

We prevent epidemics by having large numbers of people immunized, so that when there is an outbreak its spread is limited.

18 posted on 06/13/2009 7:16:38 PM PDT by wintertime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Jabba the Nutt

Please read post #18.


19 posted on 06/13/2009 7:19:29 PM PDT by wintertime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

yep! In a nanosecond.


20 posted on 06/13/2009 7:20:04 PM PDT by wintertime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson