Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

If U.S. Accepts N. Korean Nuke, Calls for Nuclear Sovereignty Could Spread (msg to US)
Chosun Ilbo ^ | 06/09/09 | Ju Yong-joong

Posted on 06/13/2009 12:51:11 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster

/begin my excerpts

If U.S. Accepts N. Korean Nuke, Calls for Nuclear Sovereignty Could Spread (message to US)

Ju Yong-joong

2009.06.13 02:51

Presidential Office: "Won't discuss it at the upcoming summit. Could cause misunderstanding if we link it to N. Korean nuclear test."

On June 12, ruling party's policy committee publicly called for both S. Korean and U.S. governments to allow the 'Restoration of Peaceful Nuclear Sovereignty,' on the eve of S. Korea-U.S. summit, which is viewed as a prelude to things to come. Instead of pushing S. Korean government to 'raise this issue right now at the upcoming summit, it would serve as a message to U.S. that if America continue to avoid getting tough on N. Korea, push for peaceful nuclear sovereignty would continue.

The ruling party revealed that they need to push 'peaceful nuclear sovereignty ' as a counterweight, just in case U.S. accepts N. Korea as a nuclear state. As a matter of fact, some in U.S. suggest that 'N. Korea is already a nuclear state' while evaluating N. Korea's nuclear capability. In this context, push for completed nuclear cycle(note: right to reprocess spent nuclear material) advocated by the ruling party is reminding U.S. that 'S. Korea cannot afford to do nothing' if U.S. acquiesces N. Korea's nuclear weapons.

/end my excerpts


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bhonukes; nknukes; nkorea; nucleardeterrence; nuke; skorea
Yes, this is the way to stop N. Korea's antics. Aiming for the heart of NPT, and scaring China to act.
1 posted on 06/13/2009 12:51:11 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; AmericanInTokyo; Steel Wolf; nuconvert; MizSterious; nw_arizona_granny; ...

Ping!


2 posted on 06/13/2009 12:51:39 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster (LUV DIC -- L,U,V-shaped recession, Depression, Inflation, Collapse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

I haven’t heard much of a response on Obama’s side. What is the ‘official’ policy now....?


3 posted on 06/13/2009 1:00:48 AM PDT by Rick_Michael (Have no fear "President Government" is here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rick_Michael
I suspect that they would rather not think about it.
4 posted on 06/13/2009 1:01:58 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster (LUV DIC -- L,U,V-shaped recession, Depression, Inflation, Collapse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Rick_Michael
I haven’t heard much of a response on Obama’s side. What is the ‘official’ policy now....?

Make lots of boring speeches, then go play golf.

5 posted on 06/13/2009 1:03:27 AM PDT by kromike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kromike

I’ve heard dems say republicans don’t focus on the economy enough. And I’ll say that’s not an entirely false statement. Afterall, the ‘economy’ keyword wasn’t all too prevalent till sept of last year.

But in respects to foreign policy, the dems are no where...but dream land. There sense of focus is sad and dangerous. With the economy, things will pass...but with nucluer weapons, you only have one try. So I hope Obama gets his act together. For the sake of this country.


6 posted on 06/13/2009 1:28:11 AM PDT by Rick_Michael (Have no fear "President Government" is here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Any DPRK missile tests should be met with a shoot-down by the Aegis combat system. With no launch vehicle, there can be no delivery—unless it is by ship.
7 posted on 06/13/2009 1:33:20 AM PDT by jonrick46 (The Obama Administration is a blueprint for Fabian Socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

S. Korea is now preparing to take the stance I recommended both they and Japan take, five years ago!!!!!! - putting China on notice of what unresolved NK nuke issue will mean.


8 posted on 06/13/2009 1:46:11 AM PDT by Wuli (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

The likelihood of global thermonuclear war in the present century keeps rising...


9 posted on 06/13/2009 2:07:46 AM PDT by Jack Hammer (here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Obama will preside over the largest nuclear proliferation increase in world history.

Weakness is provocative.


10 posted on 06/13/2009 2:08:03 AM PDT by Rob the Ugly Dude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
This reminds me of an old game I used to play online, back in 1985 or so, called "Empire." It dates back to the early 70's, and is text-based. You'd build roads, factories, towns, cities, etc, gather resources from the randomized map, and build your empire.

A old friend of mine applied a "nuclear weapons" patch, and the usual end result of every game thereafter was the utter devastation of nearly every country on the map.

11 posted on 06/13/2009 4:38:27 AM PDT by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rick_Michael

Who’s on first ?


12 posted on 06/13/2009 5:27:52 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mvpel
China is allowing N. Korea to pull a pin from a grenade called “global nuclear destruction.” What a wise move! Not.
13 posted on 06/13/2009 6:13:11 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster (LUV DIC -- L,U,V-shaped recession, Depression, Inflation, Collapse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
The US has already accepted North Korean nukes. And Iranian nukes. Under Obama, we'd accept Haiti getting nukes if it could afford them.

North Korea is China's deniable proxy. They aren't going to do a damn thing to restrain them. In fact, they will flack for North Korea and make sure no sanctions have any real effect on it. As far as China is concerned, a North Korean nuke they can deny as their own, is an "assassin's mace" any time they feel the need for it. Expecting any help from China on the subject is delusional; it is like hoping for Hitler to rein in Mussolini...

14 posted on 06/13/2009 7:57:46 AM PDT by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JasonC
I hear that handling mace requires proper skill, without which it has the tendency to bash its owner's head.:-)
15 posted on 06/13/2009 8:01:49 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster (LUV DIC -- L,U,V-shaped recession, Depression, Inflation, Collapse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson