Actually, late term abortions to save the life of the mother is almost always, always medically unnecessary nowadays. Ask any decent doctor!
Excellant post. thanks.
late term abortions to save the life of the mother is almost always, always medically unnecessary
*****************************************************
absolutely ,,, Tiller’s usual method was to kill the baby with an injection of a heart drug followed by a normal delivery... absolutely no advantage to the “mother” to deliver the baby dead over the baby being alive... NONE
Of course the “intact D&E”/”partial birth” abortion has the advantage of higher prices for the body parts as the baby is killed at the last second the parts are “fresher”...
Ex-hippie: “Actually, late term abortions to save the life of the mother is almost always, always medically unnecessary nowadays.”
I’m not knowledgeable enough to know that, but I trust you. My point was that doctors should be in the business to save lives, not end them. The goal should always be to save both mother and child. If, by some chance, one must be sacrificed, then it should only be done if there is no other possible option. I’ve heard of mothers with cancer who refused treatment in order to save their child. I wouldn’t hold it against anyone if they chose chemo and lost the baby. Those are difficult choice that are best left to the individuals involved and medical professionals. However, what’s going on today in the abortion industry is far, far different. They are murderers.