Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House panel OKs alternative fighter engine (F-35)
The Hill ^ | June 12, 2009 | Roxana Tiron

Posted on 06/12/2009 11:12:37 AM PDT by jazusamo

President Obama may have singled out a General Electric-Rolls Royce engine for the next-generation fighter jet as wasteful, but House defense authorizers will have none of that.

The House Armed Services Air and Land Forces Subcommittee on Friday agreed to authorize $603 million for the production of an alternative engine for the Joint Strike Fighter F-35.

The GE-Rolls Royce venture is going head to head with engine maker Pratt & Whitney, which is building the primary engine and has been eying to be the sole contractor for the new fighter jet.

When Obama announced his budget request for 2010 in early May, he singled out the alternative engine contract as an unnecessary defense program that “does nothing to keep us safe.”

But House defense authorizers disagree.

“If everything proceeds as planned for the Joint Strike Fighter program, the F-35 will compose the vast majority of the fighter force for the Navy, Marine Corps and the Air Force 20 years from now,” said Rep. Neil Abercrombie (D-Hawaii), the chairman of the Air and Land Forces panel. “This issue is not about Contractor A or Contractor B. The issue is that we do not believe that it is prudent for up to 80 to 90 percent of the fighter fleet to be dependent on a single engine type, provided by one manufacturer.”

To ensure that the Pentagon continues funding the second F-35 engine, lawmakers are prohibiting the military from spending more than 75 percent of the development funds for the entire F-35 program until officials certify that all funds for development and production of the second engine have been obligated. Pentagon officials also have to submit a 30-year aircraft-building plan. That plan was supposed to be submitted with the 2010 budget request, but the Pentagon didn’t do so.

House defense authorizers also are slashing two F-35s from the budget request: one slated for the Air Force and one for the Marine Corps. That brings down the overall Pentagon F-35 buy to 28. The F-35 is a multi-service and multi-national program with a price tag of approximately $260 billion.

“Overall, 28 aircraft is still twice the number of aircraft approved last year,” Abercrombie said.

The concept for a second F-35 engine has had broad support in Congress and the committees with jurisdiction over the defense budget. And so far, lawmakers have been able to restore funding for the development of the second engine in the previous three budgets.

Meanwhile, to address a growing Navy and Marine strike fighter aircraft shortfall, lawmakers on Friday authorized the Navy to enter a new multi-year contract with Boeing for the F/A-18 Super Hornets. Current projections show a shortfall of about 240 fighter aircraft until the F-35 becomes operational.

Rep. Todd Akin (R-Mo.), the ranking member of the Seapower and Expeditionary Forces Subcommittee, is a strong supporter of Boeing’s Super Hornets and included an amendment for the multi-year authorization as his panel marked up the bill on Friday.

Congress is just at the beginning of its defense budget approval process. The full House Armed Services panel is marking up the 2010 defense authorization bill on Tuesday, while the Senate committee is starting its process on June 24.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: 111th; engine; f35; ge

1 posted on 06/12/2009 11:12:37 AM PDT by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

It's green and it doesn't harm mother earth.................

2 posted on 06/12/2009 11:14:09 AM PDT by Red Badger (Inquiring minds want to know, but American Idol minds could care less...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Why does a totally planned economy need more than one supplier of anything?


3 posted on 06/12/2009 11:16:48 AM PDT by null and void (We are now in day 144 of our national holiday from reality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

I’ll bet Zer0 could come up with some kind of answer for the one supplier.


4 posted on 06/12/2009 11:19:40 AM PDT by jazusamo (But there really is no free lunch, except in the world of political rhetoric,.: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: null and void

In non-capitalist societies you don’t. Historically, it has been good to have competition because it drives costs down or at least makes folks want to stay within their boundaries.


5 posted on 06/12/2009 11:23:42 AM PDT by Blogger (It is in the religion of ignorance that tyranny begins. - Ben Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: jazusamo
The issue is that we do not believe that it is prudent for up to 80 to 90 percent of the fighter fleet to be dependent on a single engine type, provided by one manufacturer.”

IDIOT POS politicians.

Standardization, and availability of replacement parts, among other important aspects of procurement and manufacture, are made easier without scumbag politicians dictating to our military that more than one manufacturer be used.

Quality and reliability (providing the BEST equipment for our military) should be number one, not political pay-off for left-wing, UN-AMERICAN maggots like Jeffrey Immelt and his G.E.

7 posted on 06/12/2009 12:38:05 PM PDT by DocH (Official Right-Wing Extremist Veteran Seal Of Approval)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DocH
Standardization, and availability of replacement parts, among other important aspects of procurement and manufacture,

That was the argument that got the P&W TF-30 into the F-111B, F-14A, A-7A/B/C

8 posted on 06/12/2009 7:46:34 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy (a competent small government conservative is good enough for government work)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson