Skip to comments.
Fusion energy
The American Thinker ^
| June 12, 2009
| M. Simon
Posted on 06/12/2009 1:19:59 AM PDT by Scanian
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
1
posted on
06/12/2009 1:19:59 AM PDT
by
Scanian
To: Scanian
2
posted on
06/12/2009 1:39:55 AM PDT
by
Pontiac
(Your message here.)
To: Scanian
"So there you have it. At a cost of a few millions and about two more years of research or less we will know if we can use this method to power our civilization for the next billion years. And not just an Earth civilization. A multi-planet civilization. Exciting times.""If it works."
yitbos
3
posted on
06/12/2009 1:46:57 AM PDT
by
bruinbirdman
("Those who control language control minds.")
To: Pontiac
4
posted on
06/12/2009 2:07:11 AM PDT
by
Bender2
("I've got a twisted sense of humor, and everything amuses me." RAH Beyond this Horizon)
To: bruinbirdman
Polywell is the only man-initiated fusion method that’s gone over break even at this point. It *does* work, the only issues left are engineering, not physics.
5
posted on
06/12/2009 2:34:21 AM PDT
by
Spktyr
(Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
To: Rammer
6
posted on
06/12/2009 3:04:12 AM PDT
by
Rammer
To: Spktyr
the only issues left are engineering economics, not physics.
7
posted on
06/12/2009 3:20:20 AM PDT
by
Lonesome in Massachussets
(AGWT is very robust with respect to data. All observations confirm it at the 100% confidence level.)
To: Lonesome in Massachussets
20y ago this engineer heard as a student fusion was 30y away.
One real product of fusion power is this magic fusion number: p=30. It is the one constant, seemlingly.
Commercial Fusion Power Date = Today() + p
8
posted on
06/12/2009 3:29:08 AM PDT
by
steveyp
To: Scanian
If the US government is going to toss around trillions of dollars, then I think tossing a few hundred billion at Fusion would seem to make as much sense as anything else.
9
posted on
06/12/2009 3:30:12 AM PDT
by
ClearCase_guy
(We are a ruled people, serfs to the Federal Oligarchy -- and the Tree of Liberty thirsts)
To: Scanian
10
posted on
06/12/2009 3:45:54 AM PDT
by
xcamel
(The urge to save humanity is always a false front for the urge to rule it. - H. L. Mencken)
To: Scanian
It won’t free us from the maniacal grip of the lunatics in the Middle East. PC Liberals will make sure Muslims get a big cut or total control. The alternative, that Arabs pound sand and have nothing to sell but rugs, is unthinkable.
11
posted on
06/12/2009 3:47:01 AM PDT
by
hershey
To: ShadowAce
12
posted on
06/12/2009 5:07:08 AM PDT
by
conservatism_IS_compassion
(The conceit of journalistic objectivity is profoundly subversive of democratic principle.)
To: Scanian; rdb3; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; Salo; Bobsat; JosephW; ...
13
posted on
06/12/2009 5:19:46 AM PDT
by
ShadowAce
(Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: Scanian
While watching a presentation on this fusion technique, I ran across another absolutely fascinating energy discussion on the
Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactor, which is a fission reactor that was developed at Oak Ridge National Labs in the 50's, but never caught on commercially. It has many advantages over conventional nuclear power plants, including cost, safety, size, availability of fuel, minimal nuclear waste, etc.
14
posted on
06/12/2009 6:12:51 AM PDT
by
SC DOC
To: NicknamedBob; Robert A. Cook, PE
15
posted on
06/12/2009 6:25:24 AM PDT
by
sionnsar
(IranAzadi|5yst3m 0wn3d-it's N0t Y0ur5:SONY|"AlsoSprachTelethustra"-NonValueAdded|Lk21:36|FireTheLiar)
To: hershey; Scanian; sionnsar; Robert A. Cook, PE; Dead Corpse; Professional Engineer; SunkenCiv
"It wont free us from the maniacal grip of the lunatics in the Middle East. PC Liberals will make sure Muslims get a big cut or total control." Not gonna happen that way. This technology is too simple and too straightforward to be monopolized by anyone.
That includes your own friendly tyrannical government.
People are building these large vacuum tubes in their basements. Without a nuclear signature until it's actually fusing, it's hard to shut down backyard research.
One of the things we forget is that in the search for a "break-even" point, we're looking for something that outputs more energy than it takes in.
How about being willing to settle for something that produces one heck of a lot of heat for a modest investment in electricity and contraptioneering?
Most of the energy we consume at my compound is heat, usually from electricity. I'd sure like to have a tame fusion polywell water heater doing that job for me.
16
posted on
06/12/2009 3:39:36 PM PDT
by
NicknamedBob
(Error is patient. It has all of time for its disturbing machinations.)
To: SC DOC
Thanks SC DOC.
Liquid Fluoride Thorium ReactorGoogle
17
posted on
06/12/2009 5:09:22 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
To: NicknamedBob
18
posted on
06/12/2009 5:10:09 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
19
posted on
06/12/2009 5:10:23 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
To: buckrodgers
20
posted on
06/12/2009 5:21:29 PM PDT
by
Straight Vermonter
(Posting from deep behind the Maple Curtain)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson