Posted on 06/11/2009 10:08:13 PM PDT by rxsid
For Immediate Release: - 06/11/2009
U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder Refuses to Prosecute President Obama
Under False Claims Act whereby Obama was accused of Defrauding the U.S. Treasury by Illegally being a U.S. Senator from Illinois as Obama is an Illegal Alien, not a U.S. Citizen
Berg brought action against Obama and after months of delay Holder’s Staff refused to investigate
Berg raised issue of “Conflict of Interest” and why Discovery was “not” turned over and Judge Roberts Dismissed case against Obama on June 9th
obamacrimes.com is the web site for the truth about Obama
(Washington, DC – 06/11/2009) - Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the first Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama's lack of Constitutional "qualifications/eligibility" to serve as President of the United States and his cases that are still pending, Berg vs. Obama [2 cases – 1 under seal] and Hollister vs. Soetoro a/k/a Obama, et al announced today that United States Attorney General Eric Holder refused to prosecute President Barack H. Obama for Obama illegally running for and holding the U.S. Senate seat from Illinois because he was Constitutionally ineligible to be a U.S. Senator.
A False Claims Act [FCA] case is when a person has knowledge that another party has obtained money from the Government based on a false claim. In this instance, in order to be a United States Senator, you must be a United States Citizen for nine [9] years. Obama is not a United States Citizen and therefore, usurped the Office of U.S. Senator for Illinois and obtained payment from the U.S. Department of the Treasury based on his false statements that he was a U.S. Citizen and constitutionally eligible to serve the position of United States Senator.
Berg said, “What a miscarriage of justice! At a closed door hearing on June 9, 2009 because of the status of the “sealed case,” sealed because of the nature of the case, that being a “Qui Tam” or FCA [False Claims Action] case, the Attorney General through his representatives refused to proceed with the prosecution of Obama for fraudulently serving as a U.S. Senator from Illinois for 3 ½ years. [FCA cases are usually used in Medicare/Medicaid fraud cases]”
Berg continued, “I presented overwhelming evidence that Obama was ineligible to be a U.S. Senator and therefore, Obama fraudulently received a salary and benefits of nearly $1 Million Dollars.
Since the case was ‘Dismissed with Prejudice’ it is now ‘Unsealed’ and the record is open for review. The case, Berg vs. Obama, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, No. 08-cv-1933 and is available on Pacer or our website, obamacrimes.com. I, Phil Berg, will be Appealing this case !”
Berg said, “During oral argument, I raised the issue of a ‘Conflict of Interest’ as Attorney General Holder’s boss is the President Barack H. Obama, so how could they properly review this case? I suggested the appointment of a Special Prosecutor. I also raised the issue that any Discovery used in the Government’s decision to have the case dismissed, which was secured by the U.S. Department of Justice and U.S. Attorney General’s Office should be turned over to me as the Relator, however, no Discovery was turned over.”
more on Attorney Berg's site: http://www.obamacrimes.info/
“...at which point he can whip the certificate out to make all of his opponents look like fools.”
We are not fools for questioning why O has failed to perform a Constitutionally-mandated duty: “...if the President elect fails to qualify...” 20th A.
America has a right to know whether its President is legitimate, and much of the rest of the world is very curious.
Of course he can.
After the little all night power outage during his "vacation" when this issue was starting to bounce around the U.S. Supreme Court I have no doubt the problem was "corrected."
But the point was that he asked for a special prosecutor - he never got one. The case was later denied because of a conflict of interest.
Now that is just asinine.
berg stated there was a conflict of interest and asked for a new guy, but they denied it then agreed that there was a conflict. Now it is stonewalled.
This is a complete breakdown of the system.
It will NEVER be resolved at this rate even if Obama is out in 2012. I can not imagine any future president allowing a new Ag to prosecute a former head of state here.
.. of course if Obama allows Bush to stand trial .. all bets are off.
still need someone to arrest and prosecute it.
There are lots of people who have actually indicted Obama
go to
http://americangrandjury.org/
“All and all approximately 200 unique American Grand Jury members have voted to indict Obama in the past 7 weeks. Thus far we have served over 120 presentments with different courts, sheriffs, judges and district attorneys around the Nation.”
meanwhile .. no one can prosecute i guess.
that is all well and good, i agree it is even lawful.
But how do you enforce it?
Indeed, this case has very strong material to bout conspiracy theories, but the central issue is why Obowma is not being investigated for federal document fraud which he used to ascend to the most powerful job on Earth!
I am sure I am not the only one who agree’s he needs tto be dismissed
Why am I not surprised.
I hate to be a *Kill Joy*
Here, but we need to face the facts. IMHO..there is no one with any courage or power to remove *Buck Wheat
and Axelrod Inc*.from the
White House.
Interestingly, Barry's own campaign web site indicated (specifically, and only) that his Kenyan Citizenship expired then. However, they mention nothing about his British Citizenship expiring at that time. Attorney Apuzzo has a pretty good article on this, and why it's very likely (with no evidence of his renouncing it) he is still a British Citizen today.
Tuesday, April 7, 2009
Obama, the President of the U.S., Is Currently Also a British Citizen
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/04/obama-president-of-us-is-currently-also_07.html
"Berg said, “During oral argument, I raised the issue of a ‘Conflict of Interest’ as Attorney General Holder’s boss is the President Barack H. Obama, so how could they properly review this case? I suggested the appointment of a Special Prosecutor."
This latest round simply (further) exposes Barry & Holder.
Who's saying they are surprised? Not I. See post #51.
Obviously, there is something there he doesn't want the public to know.
I used to think it was because it clearly showed him being born in Kenya (still a possibility), but now I'm thinking it may be that his biological father isn't Sr. And, techically, both scenarios could be possible.
Of course, if that's the case (Sr. isn't his father), he's got (election?) fraud problems. Either way, when the truth is known, he's done "playing" the part of POTUS.
Among other things, Block 23 of the Long Form — “Evidence for Delayed Filing or Alteration”
Evidence for delayed filing: an umbilical cord almost falling off?
There ARE other channels for Berg to pursue within the Justice Department ...
US Dept of Justice — Office of the Inspector General
http://www.usdoj.gov/oig/
US Dept of Justice — Office of Professional Responsibility
http://www.usdoj.gov/opr/
Certainly hope that is the case. Meantime; Obama ignoring our Constitution has raised eyebrows and some howls. . .but no one is stopping him.
Plenty of people are trying.
We only need to succeed once.
0bama needs to succeed every time.
Yes, good point. Right now, of course, 'we' are zero to however many successes Obama has managed, thus far to get away with.
So, yes. . .let's get ONE, for starters and soon!
Perhaps I am impatient here; if the ONE, is a really big one; I can wait, just a bit longer.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.