Skip to comments.
Supreme Court clears way for sale of CHRYSLER...( Rule of Law ABOLISHED!?)
http://www.drudgereport.com/ ^
| june 9 2009
| drudge
Posted on 06/09/2009 4:28:47 PM PDT by Para-Ord.45
Edited on 06/09/2009 4:38:36 PM PDT by Admin Moderator.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 421-440, 441-460, 461-480, 481-485 next last
To: BOBTHENAILER
“There will be a reckoning for this-—of that I’m sure.”
If not, we can kiss this country good bye.
461
posted on
06/10/2009 12:17:43 PM PDT
by
Grampa Dave
(Does Zer0 have any friends, who are not criminals, foriegn/domestic terrorists, or tax cheats?)
To: Grampa Dave
That’s what I mean. If we have no law. Or, no consistent law, everyone makes decisions that protect their assets and wealth and that protection becomes more expensive.
462
posted on
06/10/2009 12:23:10 PM PDT
by
April Lexington
(Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
To: Para-Ord.45
I had hopes that they would finally do something that protected the constitution .. I guess not.
It will take close to 50 years or more to get a real set of judges that will protect our country and constitution if we act now.
We need REAL conservatives in both houses and then throw that idiot out of the White House.
463
posted on
06/10/2009 12:32:06 PM PDT
by
Munz
("We're all here for you OK? It's a circle of love" Rham Emanuel)
To: Grampa Dave
If not, we can kiss this country good bye. Heck, I did that long ago. I'm just glad I don't have any children that will have to endure the complete unraveling.
464
posted on
06/10/2009 12:33:56 PM PDT
by
unixfox
(The 13th Amendment Abolished Slavery, The 16th Amendment Reinstated It !)
To: dixiechick2000
Could Roberts really be an Earl Warren redux?
465
posted on
06/10/2009 12:39:04 PM PDT
by
itsahoot
(Each generation takes to excess, what the previous generation accepted in moderation.)
To: OneWingedShark
No better way to measure that I can think of. When the populace stocks up on guns and ammo, the only conclusion is that they are getting ready to defend and protect.
466
posted on
06/10/2009 1:47:23 PM PDT
by
BOBTHENAILER
(the obamination will ruin this nation)
To: Para-Ord.45
Makes you wonder if the Supremes are under some kind of personal bodily threat. Ginsburg temporarily held this up so her fascist friends could give the Court a talkin' to.
I say this because this decision should have been so cut and dried and yet the standing issue follows the exact same pattern as the birth certificate lawsuits.
I think we are screwed beyond a shadow of a doubt.
467
posted on
06/10/2009 2:06:21 PM PDT
by
TheThinker
(America doesn't have a president. It has a usurper.)
To: TheThinker
If they WERE under bodily threat there would be something they could do. Publicly declare what the threat was, who made it, and appeal to the troops to set right what you are about to get killed/harmed for.
468
posted on
06/10/2009 3:00:51 PM PDT
by
OneWingedShark
(Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
To: BOBTHENAILER; Grampa Dave
469
posted on
06/10/2009 3:38:58 PM PDT
by
SierraWasp
(Galloping suffocating American Socialism stinks like BO!!!)
To: Grampa Dave; BOBTHENAILER
I want you two to think of one sorta bright spot in all this crappola. City and County governments have been getting huge sales tax revenues offa auto malls and car dealers in general, to say nothing of gasoline taxes and sales taxes on those gasoline taxes in CA.
All the commie-libs in local government should be in a screaming out-rage at 0b0z0's flatulent folly about now!!!
Well, don'tcha think??? They're probably bawling about all their "crying unmet needs" right about now...
470
posted on
06/10/2009 3:48:43 PM PDT
by
SierraWasp
(Galloping suffocating American Socialism stinks like BO!!!)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; grellis; AdmSmith; Berosus; bigheadfred; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; ...
471
posted on
06/10/2009 3:53:30 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
I think the SC decided not to hear the case and simply let the appeal fall through, eg. sorry bond owners...your own your on.
472
posted on
06/10/2009 4:06:24 PM PDT
by
Marine_Uncle
(Obama should have taken up an acting career. Made more money doing what he does best.)
To: nwrep
473
posted on
06/10/2009 7:25:22 PM PDT
by
Drill Thrawl
(Obama - A flexible container of vinegar and water)
To: Tarpon
“The case was weak, harm not clearly shown. I read it as if it were one of those standing type rejections.
The wording of the order was clearly ... TRY AGAIN with a stronger better argument.
Read the fine print.”
Someone should call a Scalia expert because I think you just smacked it out of the ballpark.
Congrats.
To: Para-Ord.45
mark this day as the end of our capitalism and end of our way of life by the current temporary occupant of the White House destroying our country and a congress and supreme court out to lunch when it occurred, and the beginning of czarist rule
475
posted on
06/10/2009 11:34:51 PM PDT
by
Citizen Soldier
(Made in USA and proud of it.)
To: TurtleUp
L'État c'est Moi Exactly! And "let them eat cake" and all that...
476
posted on
06/10/2009 11:55:10 PM PDT
by
Theophilus
(Shall the throne of iniquity have fellowship with thee, which frameth mischief by a law?)
To: Citizen Soldier
Bondholders declared nonpersons...
...subsequently aborted in the 4th trimester
477
posted on
06/11/2009 12:05:08 AM PDT
by
Theophilus
(Shall the throne of iniquity have fellowship with thee, which frameth mischief by a law?)
To: Enterprise
I guess they saw the image of factory workers in old communist propaganda and figured that it rang well.
478
posted on
06/11/2009 3:54:28 AM PDT
by
Soothesayer
(The United States of America Rest in Peace November 4 2008)
To: jwparkerjr
—With the economy the worst it’s been since The Great Depression absolutely the only reason for the cost of oil to keep going up is how fast the dollar is getting weaker around the world.—
No, actually the reason the price of oil is going up again is because the SPECULATORS have returned to their “pump it up” routine once again. Eventually, the bubble will burst because there is no rational economic reason to support it, and the price of oil will plummet just like it did last winter.
479
posted on
06/11/2009 6:38:11 AM PDT
by
seatrout
(I wouldn't know most "American Idol" winners if I tripped over them!)
To: Springman; sergeantdave; cyclotic; netmilsmom; RatsDawg; PGalt; FreedomHammer; queenkathy; ...
![Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket](http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y38/lazuruslong/mipinglogo2-1.jpg)
If you would like to be added or dropped from the Michigan ping list, please freepmail me.
480
posted on
06/11/2009 7:45:44 AM PDT
by
grellis
(I am Jill's overwhelming sense of disgust.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 421-440, 441-460, 461-480, 481-485 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson