To: ClassicLiberal
“Which banks can...”
Can???
As in “are able to” or “will be allowed to by their government overseers”
2 posted on
06/09/2009 11:18:17 AM PDT by
icwhatudo
(For every clinic bombed or burned, 17 to 18 churches are burned down. MSM? MSM?)
To: ClassicLiberal
The important point is that the repayment of the Bail-Out money will be in funny money.
Another scam deal for his friends.
3 posted on
06/09/2009 11:18:54 AM PDT by
Texas Fossil
(Once a Republic, Now a State, Still Texas)
To: ClassicLiberal
Heh. Funny how when the banks were falling all over themselves to get this bailout money they never even considered having conditions that entailed paying it back to be removed from the bill, even though they pulled out all the stops to get the money in the first place.
Methinks that a lot of these banks thought this was going to be "free" money.
4 posted on
06/09/2009 11:20:10 AM PDT by
pnh102
(Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
To: ClassicLiberal
Please Mr. Man, let me pay you back . . . . . .
5 posted on
06/09/2009 11:21:44 AM PDT by
DeaconRed
(We have a STUPID president. He wants a Czar for everything. We only need a Comon Sense Leader. . .)
To: ClassicLiberal
guess the purpose was served - he can now control them without the banks owing him money - might as well take the money back and pass it to acorn
6 posted on
06/09/2009 11:24:59 AM PDT by
sloop
(pfc in the quiet civil war)
To: ClassicLiberal
Two groups: Those who paid to play and those who haven’t yet.
8 posted on
06/09/2009 11:38:06 AM PDT by
hoosiermama
(Hey hey! Ho ho! Where's your Birth Certificate/ We've a right to know!)
To: ClassicLiberal
Let's see now... the man that runs Citi is Obama's wealthy arab bud, so Citi won't care if they are OWNED.
Obama is playing favorites mixing business and government. It can't have a good ending no matter what.
To: ClassicLiberal
Banks started railing against the TARP almost immediately after they accepted the help. One CEO, Jamie Dimon of JPMorgan Chase & Co., called the money a "scarlet letter," referring to the public backlash and federal scrutiny that came with it.
They never should have accepted such a Faustian deal.
They brought it upon themselves.
The only question is if American business has learned the hard lessons German businesses learned when they entered into a similar pact in the 1930s.
10 posted on
06/09/2009 11:43:22 AM PDT by
counterpunch
(In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem. Government is the problem.)
To: ClassicLiberal
IF I win the Lottery and decide to pay off mortgages for my neices and nephews, I WILL do such.
There is no such thing as a President interferring with a bank or other business repaying a LOAN when it has the opportunity to do so.
Does Big Ears think he hs going to tell these banks that even if they have the money to pay back the loans that Big Ears and his Oval Office and “transparent administration of crooks and liars’ is going to tell a bank they cannot repay a loan???
Here comes more work for the Supremes!!!
The Supremes could have avoided all the messes \which are coming down the road by questioning the birth certificate 10 months ago.
To: ClassicLiberal
those which put Obama cronies in control of their borads?
To: ClassicLiberal
They are: JPMorgan Chase, American Express, Goldman Sachs Group, U.S. Bancorp, Capital One Financial, Bank of New York Mellon, State Street and BB&T.
http://www.cnbc.com/id/31184354
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson