Please check out my post 165, since you seemed to agree with BCrago66. I differed with him a bit. See if you can make sense of my explanation.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2267434/posts?page=165#165
It makes sense—it’s a nice rubric by which to define a court’s decisions. I guess my views on it were more using it as a club to bludgeon opponents with, rather than as a system of analysis.
Thanks for posting your views, they are very persuasive.