[DCBryan1]

DEVELOPING HARD!

[FreepShop1]

Lots of rulings...is New Haven next? God help us all if they uphold Sotomoron.

[Islander7]

SOMEONE CALL MATT DRUGE!

[LibertyRocks]

I hope Chrysler and SCOTUS can set this right. When it comes to the using of TARP funds it seems like a gigantic money-laundering scam, really. The government BOUGHT these companies and the right to oversee them with the stimulus money, it was all sleight of hand, IMHO... I hate to see what this will do to Chrysler itself...

If the Congress passes an Unconstitutional Law, and the President signs it, and then SCOTUS rules against the TARP funds altogether, does the US get their money back (meaning the tax payers), or are they going to say it’s all gone?

What about all the other companies who received funds. Would they then owe them back to the government? [I’d love to see ACORN slapped with a bill of a few million dollars that they received.] I’m guessing TARP receiving companies are going to be spending the money as quick as they can now, eh? Seems like that would be a typical reaction...

At least SCOTUS recognizes the importance of overseeing what the Executive Branch is doing in the private affairs of these countries. Can’t see how it is Constitutional for the President to appoint a board of directors, or hire and fire within a company.

Could we possibly be seeing our system work though??? Checks and Balances? Is someone on SCOTUS waking up to the nightmare they are forcing on us, and against the Constitution? I sure hope so...

[M203M4]

I’m not optimistic. Worse has transpired without much fuss.

I agree that there is a best-case scenario worth hoping for, but also submit that there is a worst-case scenario (the formal approval and legal codification of these activities from another branch of government) to be feared.

[Frantzie]

Maybe SCOTUS will ask him for the BC. Would it be too much to ask?

[Liberty Valance]

bttt

[teletech]

Ginsburg is a LIBERAL and SHE just smacked Obummer BIGTIME! Go figure.

[POWG]

I never thought I would say this in my lifetime, but here it is:

Way to go GINSBURG!!

[ConservativeMind]

Bush started it with the bridge loan using TARP monies.

0 has simply expanded it.

[wardaddy]

Damn...and from lefty Ginsburg

does not bode well for god. (little g)

he is no longer merely the “son of”

[Red Steel]

Good!

[Electric Graffiti]

The real question is WHY is Ginsburg of all the justices out front on this?

Is the court using Ruthie and her ‘leftism’ to deter critism in getting involved in this issue?

[SnarlinCubBear]

OHHhhhhhhhhhhh MAMA - I feel so gooooood!

[4Godsoloved..Hegave]

“Obama admin had urged USSC NOT to keep chrysler deal on hold”

And the USSC was suppose to shut up and listen to the boy king obama.

[snowsislander]

Good.

[clintonh8r]

Go, Ruth, GO!

[TexasKate]

Did anyone watch the alphabet news? I watched Bret Baier and there was absolutely nothing about this on his newscast. Very disappointing.

[conservativeinferno]

Why did just one Justice make this decision?

[Chode]

[Tzimisce]

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

The new fifth amendment.