Skip to comments.
How Much Should Poor Countries Be Paid To Fight Climate Change? ($140 billion annually)
New York Times ^
| June 8, 2009
| James Kanter
Posted on 06/08/2009 12:23:46 PM PDT by reaganaut1
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
I don't think the U.S. giving 3rd world countries tens of billions of dollars more per year is going to fly.
To: steelyourfaith; xcamel
To: reaganaut1
3
posted on
06/08/2009 12:24:57 PM PDT
by
onedoug
(SARAH!)
To: reaganaut1
Legalized corruption, money laundering, and neo-colonialism in one neat and shiny package.
4
posted on
06/08/2009 12:25:25 PM PDT
by
marron
To: reaganaut1
Nothing - they’re too poor to add anything to perpetrate a hoax ....
5
posted on
06/08/2009 12:25:30 PM PDT
by
SkyDancer
('Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not..' ~ Thomas Jefferson)
To: reaganaut1
How about... nothing!
Novel idea, isn’t it?
6
posted on
06/08/2009 12:25:40 PM PDT
by
wastedyears
(Rock and roll ain't worth the name if it don't make ya strut)
To: reaganaut1
Here is the solution.
Instead of giving them billions in which they will cheat anyway, we should drill here, drill now, pay less and offer our products to China and India.
Then we tell the Saudis and Iranians that they should either clean up their oil wells or close them down.
That’s how this gets fixed.
7
posted on
06/08/2009 12:26:20 PM PDT
by
EQAndyBuzz
(Climate change alarmists are Warm-Mongers. Now that's funny right there. I don't care who you are.)
To: reaganaut1
Countries in poorer parts of the world like China and India are demanding that wealthier regions like the European Union and North America fund their efforts at developing clean energy technologies
Well, since wealthier regions like the European Union and North America are the ones nagging China and India to develop "clean" energy technologies, no wonder. How about we tell the environmentalists to shut up, China and India go about their business, and we keep our money.
To: reaganaut1
Wealthy nations... Saudi Arabia and Kuwait are going it alone and paying for the Algore Boondoggle?
9
posted on
06/08/2009 12:29:13 PM PDT
by
EGPWS
(Trust in God, question everyone else)
To: reaganaut1
How much for us to buy these countries outright?
10
posted on
06/08/2009 12:31:18 PM PDT
by
a fool in paradise
(June 4, 2009 - the day Barack Obama threw all of America under the bus.)
To: reaganaut1
Oh yeah. Did NK think this up or was it the UN ?
To: reaganaut1
How Much Should Poor Countries Be Paid To Fight Climate Change?
Poor countries like the U.S.??
Zero.
12
posted on
06/08/2009 12:33:19 PM PDT
by
Kent C
To: reaganaut1
Countries in poorer parts of the world like China Is that some kind of joke? China practically owns us.
13
posted on
06/08/2009 12:35:10 PM PDT
by
paul51
(11 September 2001 - Never forget)
To: reaganaut1
I don't think the U.S. giving 3rd world countries tens of billions of dollars more per year is going to fly. you'll never make it as a politician!
14
posted on
06/08/2009 12:35:57 PM PDT
by
paul51
(11 September 2001 - Never forget)
To: reaganaut1
When the current global warming cycle reverts back to global cooling, read mile high glaciers over much of north america, billions will starve to death, most particularly in poor countries.
Global warming is a great blessing to life on earth!
15
posted on
06/08/2009 12:36:03 PM PDT
by
TheDon
To: reaganaut1
This kind of money could be a game changer, bringing clean water, sanitary waste disposal, malaria and other disease eradication to the poorest countries - save millions of lives. And instead allegedly “advanced” nations will waste it on junk science. Unfrigginbelievable.
16
posted on
06/08/2009 12:38:16 PM PDT
by
colorado tanker
("Lastly, I'd like to apologize for America's disproportionate response to Pearl Harbor . . . ")
To: reaganaut1
How about we build them each a coal fired power plant, a malaria production plant and call it square.
You know, teach a man to fish and all that.
17
posted on
06/08/2009 12:39:51 PM PDT
by
Tarpon
(You abolish your responsibilities, you surrender your rights.)
To: reaganaut1; According2RecentPollsAirIsGood; TenthAmendmentChampion; Horusra; Delacon; CygnusXI; ...
18
posted on
06/08/2009 12:40:40 PM PDT
by
steelyourfaith
("The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money" - Lady Thatcher)
To: reaganaut1
When countries don’t do what we want them to, we put sanctions on them. I don’t see why we need to pay anyone outside of this country to do anything. We don’t even pay our own people to consider the climate............we penalize them. The same should go to other countries. This money will only go in someone elses pocket. Maybe that’s the plan. We need to cut the funds off.
19
posted on
06/08/2009 12:41:31 PM PDT
by
RC2
To: reaganaut1
How Much Should Poor Countries Be Paid To Fight Climate Change? ($140 billion annually) NOTHING from us! In case those pinheads in Washington haven't noticed - we're broke; busted; tapped out; insolvent; etc.
20
posted on
06/08/2009 12:43:12 PM PDT
by
The Sons of Liberty
(Baraq Hussein mohammed 0bama - Muslim Socialist Enemy of America!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson