Skip to comments.
John McCain for President in 2012? He Says No [don't you dare run again, you scumbag RINO]
US News & World Report - Washington Whispers ^
| 2009-06-07
| Paul Bedard
Posted on 06/07/2009 7:58:01 PM PDT by rabscuttle385
No often means yes in Washington, but we hear from Sen. John McCain's posse that he is not considering a 2012 rerun of his failed 2008 presidential campaign. (W beat him in the 2000 primary, remember.) Word came this week that he is mulling over another try, but a key insider says, "Ridiculous."
(Excerpt) Read more at usnews.com ...
TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: Arizona
KEYWORDS: 2012; 2012gopprimary; anyonebutmccain; justsayno2juan; mcbama; mccain; mccain4obama; mccainantigop; mccainantipalin; mccainantisanford; mccaintruthfile; mccainunfit; mcdemocrat; mcqueeg; neveragain; no; notnownotever; rino; rino5thcolumn; traitor; trojanhorse
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-82 next last
To: Sensei Ern
Your “Top Ten” list is a very good start at the reasons I would list too!
61
posted on
06/08/2009 10:31:31 AM PDT
by
3D-JOY
To: Sensei Ern
All well and good and mostly true...still doesn’t change the fact that Rudy G, Huckabee and Romney would have also lost.
To: rabscuttle385
RINOs new home.
63
posted on
06/08/2009 5:16:48 PM PDT
by
VRWC For Truth
(Throw the bums out who vote yes on the bail out)
To: rabscuttle385
McCain wants to run again?
To: BufordP
It looks like Gingrich is running.
65
posted on
06/08/2009 10:53:19 PM PDT
by
staytrue
To: Crimson Elephant
While the loss of the rest is hypothetical, McLame was just pathetical.
66
posted on
06/09/2009 8:00:38 AM PDT
by
Sensei Ern
(http://www.myspace.com/reconcomedy)
To: Sensei Ern; Crimson Elephant
There are a great number of reasons why we lost in ‘08. Most of them can be laid at Bush and McLame’s feet.
67
posted on
06/09/2009 8:47:54 AM PDT
by
BufordP
("I've abandoned free market principles to save the free market ..." --Jorge "the Abandoner" Bush)
To: SlowBoat407
Correction: We need a true fiscal and social conservative majority in Congress in 2010.
68
posted on
06/09/2009 9:30:01 AM PDT
by
sauropod
(People who do things are people that get things done.)
To: jeltz25
He voted for Porkulus, remember?
69
posted on
06/09/2009 9:32:21 AM PDT
by
sauropod
(People who do things are people that get things done.)
To: BufordP
70
posted on
06/09/2009 9:38:54 AM PDT
by
Sensei Ern
(http://www.myspace.com/reconcomedy)
To: rabscuttle385
He would do this, just to spite Sarah. I have no doubt.
If so, what an ass.
71
posted on
06/09/2009 9:40:55 AM PDT
by
TChris
(There is no freedom without the possiblity of failure.)
To: 3D-JOY
When you coming back up here? I miss you and we need your right-wingedness to help balance the political balance in DC!
72
posted on
06/09/2009 9:46:14 AM PDT
by
Sensei Ern
(http://www.myspace.com/reconcomedy)
To: Sensei Ern
New plan is June 28 until after September 11 events.
Does the “winged-ness” mean I am an angel...LOL
You would get a lot of negative comments on that!
See you soon.
73
posted on
06/09/2009 1:57:16 PM PDT
by
3D-JOY
To: 3D-JOY
“Does the “winged-ness” mean I am an angel...LOL”
3D, you are an angel...always up in the air, harping on something! LOL
Actually, if heaven is filled with angels half as fun as you, it would still be the most excellent of places.
74
posted on
06/10/2009 8:40:36 AM PDT
by
Sensei Ern
(http://www.myspace.com/reconcomedy)
To: rabscuttle385
He Says No Tens of millions of people agree with him on this one.
To: Sensei Ern
I love you too...Harping HUH? LOL
“Winging my way” north soon!
76
posted on
06/10/2009 4:48:08 PM PDT
by
3D-JOY
To: Nervous Tick
It’s quite clear what part was the title, and what part was the comment. And the comment was dead on. Mods, to save bandwidth, may I suggest removing the comment fields?
To: the invisib1e hand
>> Mods, to save bandwidth, may I suggest removing the comment fields?
I’m not an admin mod; if you feel strongly about it, you ought to direct your post to them, not me.
On the other hand, it might be simpler, as well as more immediately useful, if you’d just take a couple sedatives and chill about the issue.
78
posted on
06/14/2009 6:48:09 PM PDT
by
Nervous Tick
(Stop dissing drunken sailors! At least they spend their OWN money.)
To: Nervous Tick
On the other hand, it might be simpler, as well as more immediately useful, if you’d just take a couple sedatives and chill about the issue.Bwhaha.
Mr./Ms. nervous tick, there's more neurosis in your addendum to the title than in anything I've posted here.
79
posted on
06/14/2009 9:47:17 PM PDT
by
the invisib1e hand
(Fraternities are the street gangs of Privileged White Boys.)
To: the invisib1e hand
>> there’s more neurosis in your addendum to the title
Uh, that wasn’t MY addendum to the title. I’m not the OP.
Are you seriously that confused? Maybe you should take even longer breaks.
80
posted on
06/15/2009 4:21:51 AM PDT
by
Nervous Tick
(Stop dissing drunken sailors! At least they spend their OWN money.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-82 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson