Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: betty boop

You’re the one who invoked divine law and later asked if tiller was an innocent life. Well, I’m asking you...is the woman innocent in this.


94 posted on 06/07/2009 4:42:08 PM PDT by csense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]


To: csense; Alamo-Girl; P-Marlowe; Dr. Eckleburg; xzins; wmfights; metmom
You’re the one who invoked divine law and later asked if tiller was an innocent life. Well, I’m asking you...is the woman innocent in this.

Hardly. But in this particular instance, the "private sin" is made actual and publicly explicit only with the help of Dr. Tiller or someone like him. He is the facilitator of the sin, the aider and abetter thereof. So long as the "private sin" remains unrealized, the unborn child is safe. Dr. Tiller was the "efficient cause," the facilitator of the sin's becoming manifest, which of course destroys the pre-born child almost every time. And he clearly embraced his role as efficient cause with a certain obscene gusto — Abortion evidently was so precious to him that he declared himself willing to go to Hell for it.

Question: Do you think Tiller was an "innocent life?"

99 posted on 06/07/2009 5:02:37 PM PDT by betty boop (Tyranny is always whimsical. — Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson