Hardly. But in this particular instance, the "private sin" is made actual and publicly explicit only with the help of Dr. Tiller or someone like him. He is the facilitator of the sin, the aider and abetter thereof. So long as the "private sin" remains unrealized, the unborn child is safe. Dr. Tiller was the "efficient cause," the facilitator of the sin's becoming manifest, which of course destroys the pre-born child almost every time. And he clearly embraced his role as efficient cause with a certain obscene gusto Abortion evidently was so precious to him that he declared himself willing to go to Hell for it.
Question: Do you think Tiller was an "innocent life?"
Do you think Tiller was an "innocent life?"
Tiller is guilt of murder, just as any woman who has an abortion is guilty of murder. The question is, as I've stated earlier (and for those who outright approve, or even tacitly approve of his execution) where do you draw the line.
I haven't heard a reasonable response yet. Just noise.
And for those who seem to think that Roeder was acting in the service of God, then explain to me why someone would flee from an act they considered to be righteous, especially in the eyes of God.