Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Neverforget01

Is it possible that Michelle’s waist is that high? The outfit minus that belt might have looked just fine (says the “fashion don’t”).


38 posted on 06/06/2009 10:21:07 PM PDT by Dianna (Obama Barbie: Governing is hard.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: Dianna

You are correct - I noticed from the start that Michelle is extremely short waisted. That is why her belts are up under her boobs. I have the opposite problem - long waisted so dresses that are cut to come in at the waist hit me higher.

She should never wear belts that chop her in half with her short waist!! She always looks best in solid colors with no belt or interruption at the waist.


58 posted on 06/07/2009 7:26:38 AM PDT by Clintons Are White Trash (Lynn Stewart, Helen Thomas, Rosie ODonnell, Maureen Dowd, Medea Benjamin - The Axis of Ugly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: Dianna
The outfit minus that belt might have looked just fine (says the “fashion don’t”).

I'm guessing that since the coat is an 'open front', meaning it doesn't have fasteners of any sort, she used the belt to keep the coat from flying open in the wind. If the belt had been closer in color to the outfit, and she hadn't worn it slap up to her armpits, it would not have looked too bad.

68 posted on 06/07/2009 11:29:52 AM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson