All topics open to discuss – except Obama eligibility

WorldNetDaily.com ^ | June 06, 2009 | Drew Zahn

[Man50D]

If someone threatened the life of the President, and was subsequently charged by the Secret Service for said offense, would that person be granted “standing” to prove the President’s eligibility?

You answered your own question. Referring to him as the President acknowledges by that person's own admission he has attained the position in accordance with the Constitution.

[null and void]

So if said person threatened the life of Barack Obama, and was then charged with by the Secret Service for threating the president, would that person be granted “standing” to prove the President’s eligibility?

As in: Prove the individual I threatened really is the president...

[null and void]

Just a theoretical academic thought exercise, of course...

[Man50D]

So if said person threatened the life of Barack Obama, and was then charged with by the Secret Service for threating the president, would that person be granted “standing” to prove the President’s eligibility?

Referring to him by name instead of occupation would be consistent with the line of thinking a person does not legitimately consider BO President.

[real_patriotic_american]

Sounds like he’s guilty right there:

Re: “All topics open to discuss – except Obama eligibility.”