.jpg)
Posted on 06/03/2009 3:08:05 PM PDT by Syncro
49 MILLION TO FIVE
June 3, 2009
In the wake of the shooting of late-term abortionist George Tiller, President Barack Obama sent out a welcome message that this nation would not tolerate attacks on pro-lifers or any other Americans because of their religion or beliefs.
Ha ha! Just kidding. That was the lead sentence -- with minor edits -- of a New York Times editorial warning about theoretical hate crimes against Muslims published eight months after 9/11. Can pro-lifers get a hate crimes bill passed and oceans of ink devoted to assuring Americans that "most pro-lifers are peaceful"?
For years, we've had to hear about the grave threat that Americans might overreact to a terrorist attack committed by 19 Muslims shouting "Allahu akbar" as they flew commercial jets into American skyscrapers. That would be the equivalent of 19 pro-lifers shouting "Abortion kills a beating heart!" as they gunned down thousands of innocent citizens in Wichita, Kan.
Why aren't liberals rushing to assure us this time that "most pro-lifers are peaceful"? Unlike Muslims, pro-lifers actually are peaceful.
According to recent polling, a majority of Americans oppose abortion -- which is consistent with liberals' hysterical refusal to allow us to vote on the subject. In a country with approximately 150 million pro-lifers, five abortionists have been killed since Roe v. Wade.
In that same 36 years, more than 49 million babies have been killed by abortionists. Let's recap that halftime score, sports fans: 49 million to five.
Meanwhile, fewer than 2 million Muslims live in America and, while Muslims are less murderous than abortionists, I'm fairly certain they've killed more than five people in the United States in the last 36 years. For some reason, the number "3,000" keeps popping into my head.
So in a country that is more than 50 percent pro-life -- and 80 percent opposed to the late-term abortions of the sort performed by Tiller -- only five abortionists have been killed. And in a country that is less than 0.5 percent Muslim, several dozen Muslims have killed thousands of Americans.
But the killing of about one abortionist per decade leads liberals to condemn the entire pro-life movement as "domestic terrorists." At least liberals have finally found some terrorists they'd like to send to Guantanamo.
Tiller bragged about performing 60,000 abortions, including abortions of viable babies, able to survive outside the mother's womb. He made millions of dollars performing late-term abortions so gruesome that only two other abortionists -- not a squeamish bunch -- in the entire country would perform them.
Kansas law allows late-term abortions only to save the mother's life or to prevent "irreversible physical damage" to the mother. But Tiller was more than happy to kill viable babies, provided the mothers: (1) forked over $5,000; and (2) mentioned "substantial and irreversible conditions," which, in Tiller's view, apparently included not being able to go to concerts or rodeos or being "temporarily depressed" on account of their pregnancies.
In return for blood money from Tiller's profitable abattoir, Democrats ran a political protection racket for the late-term abortionist.
In 1997, The Washington Post reported that Tiller attended one of Bill Clinton's White House coffees for major campaign contributors. In addition to a $25,000 donation to Clinton, Tiller wanted to thank him personally for 30 months of U.S. Marshals' protection paid for by the U.S. taxpayer.
Kansas Democrats who received hundreds of thousands of campaign dollars from Tiller repeatedly intervened to block any interference with Tiller's abortion mill.
Read more at AnnCoulter.Com
40 posts and no pic ?
Apparently one was posted and was removed.
There seems to be an argument about whether they should be posted on every abortion thread. I, for one, don't think they should.
Every time I see one I am shocked a little less. I don't like that feeling. I would hate to develop an immunity to the shock. Personally I don't know how the people who post them here so often can stand to look at them. I can't.
Never mind. :-)
You said it, Punk. And you're right.
I think it should be legal for babies to kill abortionists.
Fair is fair, right?
;-/
Probably all three. At the present time we have obama to work on us. By the time he [obama] turns us over to the other three, there won’t be much left of us.
On the bright side, Tiller has learned that he was bull shitted by some, that Almighty God did love the babies he created and He will avenge their blood.
Now he is tormented day and night forever and the innocent babies he tormented are comfronted.
Just think,a million years from now Tiller will still be tormented and it won’t even make a scratch on eternity.
Like always Ann hits it out of the ball park.
4,000 babies killed a day in the U.S. alone and somehow the left thinks that is perfectly fine. One lunatic shoots an abortionist who would kill a baby the day before it’s due date, and all hell breaks loose.
Interestingly enough I was watching Fr. Pavonne last night when I tivo’d Fr. Benedict’s Sunday Live on EWTN.
Fr. Pavonne said 22% of people responded that abortion should be allowed without absolutely no restrictions when asked in the latest Gallop poll.
It is estimated that 22-24% of the population is psychopathic. I should not have to explain the connection.
That is a different venue than that which I commented upon.
There are several others on this thread that agree with your billboard suggestion.
When you get them up all over the country, FR mail me.
That being said, I am aware of the leftist abortionist multi-billion dollar business propaganda that still keeps too many people in the dark as to what abortion really is.
Just to make it clear, the quote is what I said, but you added the question mark.“People here are mature and intelligent enough to understand the situation with out graphics of that nature?”
Are they?
You obviously don't believe that people here at Free Republic are mostly mature and intelligent.
I disagree, no problem.
And I don't disagree with using that type of image in certain situations to startle people into seeing what really happens when some "tissue" is gently taken from a woman's body. (please note the sarcasm)
I have been on more than one thread lately where graphics of the nature of what you posted were put up, and in virtually all those cases the mods chose to remove them.
You know where you’re going to end up for that one. :)
“I have been on more than one thread lately where graphics of the nature of what you posted were put up, and in virtually all those cases the mods chose to remove them.”
so much for “Free” Republic
Go get’em, Ann.
"Woe to the rebellious children," declares the LORD, "Who execute a plan, but not Mine, And make an alliance, but not of My Spirit, In order to add sin to sin; (Isaiah 30:1)
bump to read later
code pink tactics only turn people off.
See them around lately?
Read the whole thread, and you will see why it's obvious that every thread shouldn't be spammed with those pictures
Wow, this is one powerhouse article. The last few paragraphs are golden. I can already hear the liberals howling at the “hateful” exposure of their ghoulish baby-killing hypocrisy.
"IMO those pictures should not be posted unless the purpose of posting them is to shock specific people into realizing the holocaust that is going on. If they are posted willy nilly on every thread and every bulletin board, I believe that people may develop an immunity to them.Very good points."If somebody comes on a thread and starts claiming that babies are not being murdered or that fetuses are not really babies, then you can and should respond by posting the pictures. But to simply post pictures to the choir or as a general attempt to "shock" the public, I do not believe is a practice I would condone."
Thanks
Most people here at FR understand that reasoning.
Well put
There will be much wailing and gnashing of teeth in Liberal Land when they read that paragraph!
Let me know if you'd like to be added to the Ann Coulter ping list.
The ELCA abandoned God many years ago.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.