Well if Arafat was assasinated by his own troops do you think they’d have any problems with taking out a U.S. President?
This man’s sutpidity knows NO bounds.
Duh, I meant Sadat, not Arafat.
No.
But why should they do an "Anwar Sadat" on him? He's playing right along and into their hands. He's either an utter fool or a traitor. Which one, it doesn't really matter at this point. The results are the same.
Actually Barack is probably the best thing that has happened to the Muslim world — being able to take down America from within, and hasten their goal of a worldwide Caliphate? It’s not as if it would advance the agenda or the jihadists to take him down either — here is a man who has basically promised Jerusalem to Palestine according to several Saudi sources. Of course, there could be some idiot out there who believes Obama’s story of conversion to Christianity and view him as an apostate (worse than a Christian or a Jew, or any other non-Muslim). Which by the way is another point in the column of being a Muslim for Obama — he literally proclaimed he was a Christian meaning he would be an apostate. That there is not one Fatwa against him for this tells me that most of the Islamic world (even some of the most radical imams) believe he must be practicing taqiyya.
As for Arafat being assassinated by his own troops — that’s the first time I’ve heard that allegation myself. I seem to remember him going to France for medical treatment(s) before it was reported he was in a coma and died. [Now, in the book I’m reading by Joel C. Rosenberg, that is what happened to Arafat in the beginning of the book — I hope you’re not confusing the two!]