Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tiller's Killing: Necessary... But Unlawful
Commonweal Review Magazine ^ | June 3, 2009, 8:07 am | David Gibson

Posted on 06/03/2009 11:13:53 AM PDT by lewisglad

In a commentary today, Creighton theologian R.R. Reno parses the justifications for killing an abortion doctor like George Tiller, and finds that alleged murderer Scott Roeder came up short–though barely. Reno says that “The blanket condemnation [by Catholics bishops] of ‘violence’ seems unhelpfully expansive” and so he wants to explain that the reasons Tiller’s killer was wrong “are not as simple as they seem.”

Reno says that under Christian thinking, such an action would have to satisfy three conditions: It would target the guilty, not the innocent; it would have to be necessary (principally to protect others); and it would have to be an act of self-defense that does not “violate the principle of legitimate authority” by being premeditated and calculated violence, as Tiller’s killing was. Reno says the suspect got two out of three:

The emphasis on “unlawful use of violence,” the evocation of “vigilantism,” and the description of Tiller’s killer as a “vigilante killer” are all exactly right. We are all sinners, but it is painfully obvious that Dr. George Tiller acted in wanton disregard for the sanctity of life. Killing him did not violate the principle of innocence. Moreover, he gave no evidence of stopping. As a result, perhaps something like the principle of necessity can be satisfied. But it is certainly obvious that his killer was acting as the law unto himself. He arrogated to himself the roles of jury, judge, and executioner. He violated the principle of legitimate authority.

That strikes me as far too close to justification, as others would argue that unjust laws shouldn’t stop us. With their redesigned site, the First Things blog now allows comments, and the first commenter on Reno’s thread pressed him to go further, asking how Reno’s argument would apply to Bonhoeffer or the Nazi resistance. Good question.

(Excerpt) Read more at commonwealmagazine.org ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events; US: Kansas
KEYWORDS: abortionists; christianity; georgetiller; roeder; tiller
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-187 next last
To: xzins
Amen!

And the Lakers won. God is good.

141 posted on 06/04/2009 8:39:39 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg; xzins
Arise, and go down to the potter's house, and there I will cause thee to hear my words." -- Jeremiah 18:1-2

I happened on Jeremiah 18 a couple of weeks ago and found that chapter to be filled to the brim with all manner of theological gems.

I posted this thread and have been looking for other sermons on the chapter.

142 posted on 06/04/2009 8:40:05 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe; humblegunner; wagglebee; metmom; xzins; betty boop
As a general rule as a thread progresses, the ping lists tend to grow. I have had a number of disagreements with wagglebee on this thread and others. He did not ping his "posse", he just pinged a bunch of us who had responded to his posts, argued with him, agreed with him or whatever.

Indeed, I had already been pinged by metmom to the post by humblegunner.

And my reply to her was "Jeepers" which roughly means I never would have expected that from him.

I very much appreciate the follow-up pings in the hopes that he will extend and clarify the earlier remarks as all of you shed light on why that initial post was so disturbing.

143 posted on 06/04/2009 8:40:56 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: xzins

What if Tiller’s widow were to hire a hitman to kill Roeder? Using your logic, that would be perfectly OK.


144 posted on 06/04/2009 8:41:56 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (The McCain/Palin ticket was like a Kangaroo, stronger on the bottom than at the top)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued; xzins
Someone else will fill the gap, and in the meantime, Tiller the Killer has become a martyr.

I Don't think so. I suspect that anyone who has seen his handiwork will be glad that he is dead. Most people who consider themselves "pro-choice" are repelled by the likes of Tiller. Roeder not only killed him, but brought light to his abominiations.

I will pray that Roeder is acquitted. He has already saved more lives than he took, and it's only Thursday.

145 posted on 06/04/2009 8:44:27 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued; P-Marlowe

You didn’t answer the question.

Do YOU think abortion is murder?

Let us say that there is a murderer (person A) who operates only between midnight and 4 am when everyone is asleep. Let’s say that the government creates a law that says that isn’t murder because they were asleep anyway, and now they continue to be in sleep.

At the time of their deaths they were “sleepers.” They’re still “sleepers.”

So the murderer continues killing from midnight to 4 am. Lots of liberals are happy with it, because it rids us of the surplus population.

Person B comes along and offs the murderer, but he gets charged with murder, because his act wasn’t between midnight and 4am, and the murderer was awake and not asleep.

Is person B a murderer? Is person A a murderer...after all, the law says he isn’t?

Is it just possible....vaguely possible...that the LAW is wrong?


146 posted on 06/04/2009 8:50:05 PM PDT by xzins (Chaplain Says: Jesus befriends those who seek His help.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued; xzins
Do you believe that if he had not been killed on Sunday, that Tiller was going to eat breakfast, read the paper and go to work and murder an innocent child or two on Monday morning?

I do.

That is why I find it hard to condemn Roeder. Roeder obviously believes he killed a cold blooded serial child murderer. Do you believe that? Really?

147 posted on 06/04/2009 8:50:26 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad

Tiller ping


148 posted on 06/04/2009 8:58:15 PM PDT by QBFimi (When gunpowder speaks, beasts listen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe; xzins; blue-duncan
Serendipity. Here's George Whitefield's sermon on Jeremiah 18...

THE POTTER AND THE CLAY

149 posted on 06/04/2009 9:20:12 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl
And my reply to her was "Jeepers" which roughly means...

I've learned within that "Jeepers" lies a multitude. 8~)

150 posted on 06/04/2009 9:26:48 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg
Serendipity.

I think you meant to say... DIVINE PROVIDENCE. :-)

Thanks

151 posted on 06/04/2009 9:28:10 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg

LOLOL!


152 posted on 06/04/2009 9:31:37 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: hocndoc

Interesting questions but I don’t see how they relate to the hypothetical point I was making.


153 posted on 06/04/2009 9:34:41 PM PDT by TigersEye (Cloward-Piven Strategy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe; xzins; blue-duncan
CALVIN ON JEREMIAH 18
154 posted on 06/04/2009 9:55:04 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

Good move, HG.

(By the way, your original view doesn’t leave much leeway for the Lord’s work in each person’s life. He’s much more likely to turn a live sinner into a - sometimes reluctant - prophet or preacher than a dead innocent.

He is the Creator and has been known to resurrect people. But that’s rare.)


155 posted on 06/05/2009 12:03:16 AM PDT by hocndoc (http://www.LifeEthics.org (I've got a mustard seed and I'm not afraid to use it.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg

Greeting from the great gun toting state of Texas.


156 posted on 06/05/2009 8:25:57 AM PDT by Lord_Calvinus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe; humblegunner; xzins
I've been accused of being a Calvinist. I think wagglebee may have accused me of that on one or two occasions.

No, I don't think I ever accused you of being a Calvinist.

I'm pretty sure that I did call you a "Jack Chick comic book reading snake handler" (we're not in the Religion Forum, so I can say Jack Chick all I want) once or twice. :-)

157 posted on 06/05/2009 1:41:56 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Abortion is murder at some point. Late term abortion definitely is. And Roe vs. Wade is terrible law. But shooting an unarmed man in church in the name of life doesn’t help the cause at all.

Public opinion had turned our way. Hopefully, the public will recognize it as the abberation that it is. But comments supporting it from pro-lifers endanger any gains the pro-life movement has made.


158 posted on 06/05/2009 3:23:39 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (The McCain/Palin ticket was like a Kangaroo, stronger on the bottom than at the top)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued; P-Marlowe
Late term abortion definitely is. And Roe vs. Wade is terrible law.

Yet, Roe v. Wade is declared "stare decisis". It is settled law that cannot be assailed is how it is presented. And it was not enacted by legislature, but was imposed by judicial fiat.

It is a usurpation, a disenfranchisement, and the seeds of violent opposition lie in that very fact.

159 posted on 06/05/2009 3:44:44 PM PDT by xzins (Chaplain Says: Jesus befriends those who seek His help.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet; lewisglad
Where do you draw the line between Biblically justified and unjustified under these circumstances?

I am reminded of Johnathan Edwards sermon. His text was the following:

Christians need to wait upon the Lord. We don't always see justice, but in due time justice will be given.

160 posted on 06/05/2009 4:18:51 PM PDT by HarleyD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-187 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson