Observation is not a matter of faith.
Number 14 does address your point it states that direct observation of living forms and extinct forms indirectly observed from the fossil record support my assertion that there has been sufficient time to account for the diversity of life we see today.
What empirical evidence do you have to the contrary?
What do think the difference is between microevolution & macroevolution?
Which of the 14 points do you have a problem with?
Observation is not a matter of faith. [excerpt]Do you believe that [colloquial] pond scum evolved into four legged land dwelling mammals?
Number 14 does address your point it states that direct observation of living forms and extinct forms indirectly observed from the fossil record support my assertion that there has been sufficient time to account for the diversity of life we see today. [excerpt]No. 14 is an explanation based on interpretation of historical evidence (not addressing the validity of said interpretation), and is not a demonstration.
What empirical evidence do you have to the contrary? [excerpt]I have not addressed any evidence that might contradict No. 14
What do think the difference is between microevolution & macroevolution? [excerpt]Evolutionists define the words to have little to no difference in meaning.
Which of the 14 points do you have a problem with? [excerpt]We can deal with the 14 points once we deal with the lack of objectivity currently inherent to the poster of aforementioned points.