[Fichori]

“Just as I thought, you have no empirical evidence to show that any of those 14 points are not correct”

I never addressed your 14 points and to suggest that I have is disingenuous.

I asked you to back up your claim in post 31 that micro+time=macro and you referred me to your point 14 which did not address my question.

I have challenged you to provide a demonstration of your assertion and you have (apparently) declined.

Hence my assertion that your claim in post 31 is a statement of faith.

[Ira_Louvin]

At what point does microevolution crease, wouldn’t a million years of microevolutionary changes add up to macroevolution?

The perceived difference between “microevolution and macroevolution” was not one of the 14 points because if you accept “microevolution” then you accept the premise of the evolutionary theory. So we are both in agreement, with the disagreement being of the amount of time involved.

If you have a problem with evolution then it is one of those 14 points.

Which one is it, and what evidence do you have to support your assertion?