[Ira_Louvin]

At what point does microevolution crease, wouldn’t a million years of microevolutionary changes add up to macroevolution?

The perceived difference between “microevolution and macroevolution” was not one of the 14 points because if you accept “microevolution” then you accept the premise of the evolutionary theory. So we are both in agreement, with the disagreement being of the amount of time involved.

If you have a problem with evolution then it is one of those 14 points.

Which one is it, and what evidence do you have to support your assertion?

[Fichori]

“At what point does microevolution crease, wouldn’t a million years of microevolutionary changes add up to macroevolution?” [excerpt]

That is besides the point.

You stated as fact something that has never been observed to be true.

“The perceived difference between “microevolution and macroevolution” was not one of the 14 points because if you accept “microevolution” then you accept the premise of the evolutionary theory.” [excerpt]

Depends on who gets to define micro-evolution.

Something I have not addressed.

“So we are both in agreement, with the disagreement being of the amount of time involved.” [excerpt]

Not by a long shot.

“If you have a problem with evolution then it is one of those 14 points.” [excerpt]

My ‘problem’ is with your apparent lack of scientific objectivity.

“Which one is it, and what evidence do you have to support your assertion?” [excerpt]

Your refusal to demonstrate your claims supports my assertion that your claims are statements of faith.