77% of Georgia Voters Favor ID Checks Before Voting, Justice Department Disagrees

rasmussen report ^ | Tuesday, June 02, 2009 | Rasmussen

[potlatch]

Speedy Miranda? Lol

[devolve]

.

Yup

Adding Kennedy & McCain would be overkill!

[potlatch]

With his terminal illness I avoid Kennedy now.

[devolve]

.

I dunno

Kennedy did not cry for Mary Jo

He used her

[potlatch]

Maybe, as a woman, I have more reluctance to kick a dying man, I’ll let God deal with him now.

[devolve]

.

Many of the most evil tend to hang on too long

[potlatch]

[Many of the most evil tend to hang on too long]

Some do and we note it because they ARE evil.
Many who are evil may die young and never fulfill their evilness.

Many ‘good’ die young.

Life has no rhyme or reason sometimes.

[devolve]

.

Enjoy your takeout while you can!

[chatham]

Amen, Amen !

Sad to say but I think there will be a tripping point.

[sport]

I seriously doubt it.

There may be a grumbling point but that is as far as it wil go.

[SunkenCiv]

Rasmussen Reports polling conducted during Election 2008 found that 77% said prospective voters should first be required to show a legal photo ID first. Georgia’s voters also held that view two years earlier despite a state judge’s ruling that a new law requiring a photo ID at the polls was a violation of the state constitution. Nationally, three-out-of-four U.S. voters (76%) said a person should be required to show photo identification at the polls before being allowed to vote.

"Hey, I've got a shopper card, quit hasslin' me."

[bustinchops]

GA needs to do about voting what CA just did about homosexual marriage.

[Major Matt Mason]

Tyranny by the minority.

[MrB]

They should enforce the law anyway,

and arrest any federal agent that comes to thwart it.

[MrB]

“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.” -John Fitzgerald Kennedy

The bastards need to understand this.
I think they do. I think they’re looking for an excuse to shoot those who oppose their collectivist/elitist goals.

[MrB]

That’s what the message was in Philly.

[Tzimisce]

They’re going to be HARD to beat in 2010.

And if the Republicans don’t GET THEIR ACT TOGETHER - we’ll be looking at liberal rule forever. :(

[itsahoot]

Thirty-three percent (33%) disagree and say it is more likely that people are prevented from voting who should be allowed to do so.

It is near impossible to prevent a legal voter from voting, unless of course the New Black Panthers are standing in the way, which is perfectly legal now.

[itsahoot]

THEY WORK FOR US NOT THE OTHER WAY AROUND ??????

Well, constitutionally that would be correct, but there is no way that they work for us.

[itsahoot]

Why would anyone in GA allow the US Justice department to declare a state matter

The voting rights act only applied to several Southern States, why didn't this go to the Supreme Court?