Posted on 06/03/2009 6:08:21 AM PDT by jmaroneps37
The FBI was watching this cowardly skunk? Why was he allowed to shoot two Americans without being stopped?
The War on Terror might not exist to Obama, but it surfaced at a Little Rock Army recruiting center Monday. These days our double talking president is calling the War on Terror America’s “Overseas Contingency Operation.” What is the difference?
This change meant nothing when a coward named Carlos Bledsoe, who hides behind the name Abdul-Hakim Mujahid Muhammad, fired 10 rifle rounds into an Army Recruiting Center.
Muhammad a home grown terrorist, might have been “comforted” when Obama introduced a new name to our war against the Islamist’s plans to murder or enslave Americans, but it changed nothing.
The two soldiers, both American heroes, who Muhammed shot without warning, are now causalities in the War on Terror, not some “Overseas Contingency Operation.”
One was murdered in our own country in an Army installation which is chilling, but the rest of the story is worse.
WABC TV reports Muhammad was being tracked by the FBI, which became interested in him since he traveled to Yeman to study Islam.
It reports he was arrested there when he offered a Somali passport trying to enter.
This casts doubts on the tired government line “At this point it appears that he specifically targeted military personnel, but there doesn’t appear to be a wider conspiracy.” Of course not!
Can the FBI or Obama please explain how a cowardly Muslim convert from Little Rock got his hands on a Somali passport? Could you get hold of a phony passport from a Muslim country or anywhere?
This is an FBI cover up of a terrorist plot. It’s infuriating. If he wasn’t part of a wider plot why was the FBI “watching” Muhammed or why weren’t they watching him?
(Excerpt) Read more at collinsreport.net ...
Only some murders are heinous to his highness
Not to mention we have lots of uniformed military personnel but 3rd term abortionists are so rare they are a national treasure
sarc
My question exactly! Someone should lose his job on this one.
Citizens, especially victims of crime, knows law enforcement is great at chalk lines and layout cones. Not so great at defending your life — That is your job.
This is an act of terrorism on our soil. An American solider was ruthlessly gunned down by a self-avowed jihadist on his watch. As Commander-in-Chief (so-called in his case) he has a duty and a responsibility to speak to the American people on this.
Some are more equal than others in Ameriqa, I gather...
Because he hadn't committed a crime yet. When you treat Islamic extremism as a law enforcement matter, and not a military threat, then you play be law enforcement rules.
I'd love to jump on the FBI for this, but what do you expect them to do? Arrest every terror suspect out there, and then get crushed in court under accusations of 'making things up' and 'harassing innocent Muslims'?
All the FBI can do is watch, until they have enough evidence for an arrest and conviction. They're not authorized to do more.
“Obviously the FBI by itself is not smarter than the NYPD.”
Most cops will tell you the FBI’s major talent is finding a television camera so they can take credit for a job not done. Why do you think they like to get involved in so many local things where they have no jurisdiction.
I think it doesn’t help to equate tiller with this case. I did so myself when this first happened. This is an act of terrorism, an attack on the military on our soil and should be treated very differently than the tiller matter. The only similarity is that zero spoke out about the tiller murder and has not spoken out on this yet.
*play by law enforcement rules.
Does Muhammad have a criminal record, anyone know?
“You want to find a Dunkin Donuts, call a cop.”
COnverted to islam in jail, so I’d say.... yes...
yes, he was a prison convert.
Thanks! Then I’m wondering why the Feebs couldn’t’ve picked him up on a firearms beef?
Wait...I thought right wing Christians are all we have to worry about.
Funny...The “black house” will make a statement about the “Tiller” murder but nothing on the killing of our Military men?
I guess, had it been a white male Christian they would have...I’m fed up with this nonsense!
True. However, I do fear when "they" do wake up and begin going after these monsters with a more military view it will be focused on the heinous right-wingers.
Everyone knows it’s just those bitter white folks that accumulate arsenals.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.